United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

Simandle deserved to die and burn in *** Bye ***

Old ugly Drunk *** judge

A White South Jersey Federal Judge Tosses out another case with No Regard for black and Latino inmates who are living in Camden Counties Deplorable conditions. The judge and media have teamed up to spin the story and claim the complaints were frivolous when in fact, the claims are not frivolous, they are credible.

Simandle is highly connected to South Jerseys political boss, George E. Norcross III who has habitually meddled in cases that are against him and those who are his allies. Simandle should be under investigation for misconduct and fraud. He had tossed many civil rights cases recklesslyband then had it spun and reported to the press to cover up his absent minded rulings The South Jersey courts have a history of being corrupt.

Norcross may be using his influence in the PA courts which should be investigated Lewis Katz has concerns about the meddling of Norcross and influences he uses on judges to violate the color of law and wrongfully dismiss cases of massive civil rights violations Judge Simandle leaks opinions and stories to the press and Norcross has a paid off report plaster the negative story to appear at the top of search engines. Norcross's daughter Lexie who has faced criticism for her leadership of the website and background, varying from being hired right after quitting college and possessing zero journalism experience to criticism over news judgment and for directing the website to highlight trashy gossip stories and clickbait over real, local news Norcross and Simandle have destroyed lives and disregarded civil rights This reckless behavior enabled cyber harassment; Ponzi Schemes and acts of racial inequality Both Simandle and Norcross are a vile disgrace to the justice system Norcross is a serious problem and should be indicted along with anyone partaking in this unjust political corruption

Judge Jerome Simandle tosses civil rights cases against crime boss and his allies.

Federal prosecutors in the United States declined to pursue civil rights allegations against law enforcement officers 96 percent of the time from 1995 to 2015, results from a Tribune-Review investigation released on Saturday reveal.

In a six month period the newspaper built up a database of close to 3 million records from the Department of Justice’s National Caseload Data and analyzed criminal complaints by the calendar year when they were filed.

Statistics say that 12,703 potential civil rights violations were turned down across the country out of 13,233 total complaints from 1995-**** including high-profile incidents in Ferguson, Missouri, Chicago and New York City.

Alarmingly, prosecutors received referrals involving 21,364 law enforcement officers over the 21 year time frame, yet only 631 were convicted of civil rights abuses.

While 11 federal districts, including Alaska, Colorado and New Jersey, received a total of 240 referrals, no officers were formally charged.

The paper says the most frequent reasons cited for declining civil rights complaints involving officers were mainly weak or insufficient evidence, lack of criminal intent required under a 1945 Supreme Court ruling standard, and orders from the Justice Department.

“We don’t hesitate to open a file on a civil rights case, yet it’s one of the most difficult cases to gather sufficient evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt at trial,” Steve Kaufman, from the U.S. Attorney’s office for Western Pennsylvania said. “Obviously then you do have a relatively high percentage that don’t end up being prosecuted.”

Craig Futterman, a law professor who founded the Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project at the University of Chicago, says that pursuing policemen who have violated the law is an area that authorities need to look into.

“This is an area, quite honestly, where the feds need to be bolder and put greater resources in,” he said. “Indeed, the failure to aggressively bring those cases has allowed too many abusive officers to believe that they can operate without fear of punishment.”

One constant in the investigation’s findings is that no matter how many referrals prosecutors received across the U.S. they consistently declined more than 90 percent of them.

The number has remained steady even as the number of smartphones, able to record law enforcement officers abusing civil rights by photo or video, in civilian hands has risen.

For all other non civil crimes, prosecutors rejected only about 23 percent of complaints, the paper found.

This content was originally published by teleSUR.

TwitterFacebookemail

This entry was posted in Daily Digest, National and tagged Civil Rights Complaints, Department of Justice, law enforcement, Police. Bookmark the permalink

Judge Jerome Simandle is a

judge, who, through outright corruption, has prevented the wronged from getting a fair hearing in our courts. He has a close relationship with Archer Greiner and has allowed them to release plaintiffs case to paid off news media sites in South Jersey. They are all connected to crime boss George Norcross and Senator Stephen Sweeney

It's a Racket they are running and they are massively violating the Civil rights Act in America. There needs to be a federal indictment on them. Below is a story written back on 2007. Courier removed the story in 2016 since Norcross paid off the newspaper to make stories like this go away.

Unfortunately, the same Judge is still tossing cases for Norcross and his corrupt allies who he protects via Simandles biased and unethical rulings.

It's all a game for Norcross, Sweeney, Archer Greiner, Simandle and their allies who need to be exposed

Majority of lawsuit against power broker and his political friends tossed out

12:40 AM, Mar. 31, 2007

In tapes central to the case, George E. Norcross was heard bragging about his influence over political leaders at every level.

In tapes central to the case, George E. Norcross was heard bragging about his influence over political leaders at every level.

Written by

RICHARD PEARSALL

Courier-Post Staff

FILED UNDER

Local News

A federal judge Friday dismissed the bulk of a lawsuit filed against Democratic power broker George E. Norcross and others in connection with the so-called Palmyra tapes, but allowed one part of the 4-year-old suit to proceed.

U.S. District Judge Jerome Simandle ruled that the plaintiffs, Moorestown attorney Ted Rosenberg and Palmyra Mayor John Gural, failed to demonstrate "any harm to their "business or property' as a plaintiff is required to show under the federal RICO laws."

Rosenberg and Gural filed suit under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, one of ...

CONTINUE READING IN OUR PAID ARCHIVE

Story has been removed. Hmmm?????