Junior Reviewer

Ban unethical lead generation companies with a single complaint

Are you getting unnecessary calls on your phone? Registered your number to TPS, and still getting harassed by those calls, then be sure that your number got leaked due to unethical practice called "˜sugging'. No need to fear with a single complaint you too can put a ban on this illegal practice. Now it is obvious that you get irritated getting marketing calls middle of your busy schedule and that often go the extreme. Even TPS cannot stop it, and then you feel disgusted and complain against the same. However, TPS cannot be blamed in this case, there are number of lead generation companies who in the guise of survey collects data including those numbers who have opted for TPS. As a result, many marketing calls are directed at your phone. Some lead generation companies are known to breach the trust of their consumer by trying to sell them products while going conducting research over the phone. According to Direct Marketing Association, this is termed as sugging and this practice is strictly forbidden by DMA, but still some lead generation companies are registered with complaints to use this practice. Phruit Limited, reputed lead generation company in UK is a good example who recently was involved in such unethical practices and made their reputation at stake. A single complaint from a customer fueled investigation against them, and it was found that the company has broken three most important DMC codes, this includes: 1. 21.18 and 21.20 on TPS compliance and data cleansing2. 3.11 under which Phruit has a responsibility for compliance by suppliers3. 3.18 on "sugging" or carrying out sales and marketing under the disguise of research Based on this complaints DMA suspended Phruit from its membership. Such a punishment is surely hard on the part of business. So if somebody whom you know is still receiving marketing calls even after they had registered to TPS then ask them to lodge a complaint immediately. Ask them to raise their voice by web complaints or they can comment on complaints, which already exist. Or can choose any social media to express their views about the company. This will help others from being trapped. Or people can opt for mails, and ask the calling company to stop such practices immediately. Now if you or any know person is receiving calls from Phruit Limited then they can contact them in the following address: Phruit LimitedThe Barn Huddlestone's Wharf Newark Nottinghamshire Ng24 4ul Call them at: 0844 41 4* 741 Other than this, you can also mail directly to the company director, Phil Lightfoot. As "˜sugging' is making marketing calls loose customer faith, lead generation companies are losing their foothold in global market. For some unethical companies the one, which are genuine, too gets their business hampered. Better option is that whenever you get a call from marketers, ask them whether they will sell your personal details to any third parties or not. It is to ensure that you can later complain or disclose the company on the web if they breach your trust. Shaun Aster loves to raise his voice against such unethical companies and fights for protecting consumer rights. He writes about unethical practices like "˜sugging' opted by companies like Phruit make consumers aware and stay alarmed.
View full review
ID
#358767 Review #358767 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Junior Reviewer

Do not fear marketing calls anymore: Be under protective layer of consumer rights

Sharing information without making people aware that they are going to get marketing calls which they do not desire, is an illegal step. Collecting information about a particular individual in the form of a survey call and then selling out that information to product selling companies is popularly known as "˜sugging'. Members of DMC who accounts of this allegation can be suspended or their company may be ceased if they are found guilty. You may get innumerous call every day and you may be irritated by them. You think to register your number to TPS. However, after TPS registration you still find that you are getting marketing calls. Do not blame TPS for it. It is not them who have breached your trust but it is some lead generation company that has made you fool. Such a reputable lead generation company running in UK do got charges against them and got themselves banned from DMC. This case was a telemarketing activity undertaken by Phruit. Commission has investigated based on a complaint from single consumer who was registered with TPS but still has been contacted with of will-writing services, which Phruit has previously offered him in the guise of a survey call. Then DMC found out that there were about 100 web-based complaints against Phruit and there was an attempt to validate compliance with TPS cleansing. Those 100 complaints were attributed to Phruit directly or to companies who were using their data. Commission underwent a two-year discussion period with Phruit and their compliance team and anchored their ongoing concern over TPS compliance and misrepresentation of research. Based on the evidence forwarded to commission, it was found that Phruit was misrepresenting itself as a survey company, but the calls were actually designed to sells and goods and services to people concerned. The practice was made public through number complaints, and it was seen that Phruit was no better than a cold cal marketing agency. Lot of sub sequent complaint where made against those companies who were using Phruit's data and while Phruit in turn responded to certain questions the company failed to provide key data as to why they share data to other companies, even the information of those who have already registered for TPS. Commission found it breaching three codes of practices, namely: 1. 21.18 and 21.20 based on TPS compliance and data cleansing.2. 3.11 is another rule under which Phruit has a responsibility for compliance by suppliers.3. 3.18 charged on for "sugging" or carrying out sales and marketing under the disguise of research. Compliance found this as a serious offence and saw that it involved fundamental code on TPS compliance, misrepresentation and failure to comply by code-complaint. Commission proposed that Phruit will be suspended for a whole year and the lifting of this suspension is conditional. To get membership Phruit needs to prove that they were not guilty and has to justify their action. If you have, fallen prey of such marketing calls forwarded from Phruit then feels free to make your complaints their office address. Contact them at:Phruit LimitedThe BarnHuddlestone's WharfNewarkNottinghamshireNg24 4ulOr you can call Phruit at: 0844 41 4* 741 Shaun Aster is a prolific writer who generally writes on issues related to consumer rights and their violation. She raises her voice against unethical lead generation companies, unveils their tactics and makes consumers aware, like the way she expressed her views on Phruit.
View full review
ID
#358766 Review #358766 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content

For more information read Blog article