The John Stewart Company
The John Stewart Company Overview
The aggregated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.
The John Stewart Company has 1.0 star rating based on 2 customer reviews. Consumers are mostly dissatisfied.
- Rating Distribution
Consumers are not pleased with Billing Practices and Customer service. The price level of this organization is high according to consumer reviews.
Monterey, California
Stay away!
Failure to follow building codes failing to repair failing appliances Slander lies filing false performance review reports
San Francisco, California
Violations of Federal HUD (LIHTC) & State (TCAC) subsidy programs.
The John Stewart Co's President and CEO, Jack Gardner, fraudulently overcharges DISABLED RESIDENT nearly 70% of only source of income of SSI. Despite decades of administering the Federal HUD (LIHTC) and State (TCAC) low-income-housing programs, Jack Gardner, purposely and forcibly overcharges DISABLED RESIDENT 70% of rent, while the programs regulate not more than 30% for extreme-low-income and DISABLED RESIDENT.
Jack Gardner's fraudulent overcharges cause DISABLED RESIDENT "shortage of food" and unable to pay for necessities.
Preferred solution: Full refund
San Francisco, California
The John Stewart Company - Ripoff Management
The John Stewart Company is a rip-off management company, cover up crimes and criminals, and conceal surveillance photos of criminal activities. The company's policy is: profit comes FIRST, property value comes SECOND, cover up criminals and conceal surveillance photos come THIRD, residents' rights and safety come LAST AND LEAST.
The company has violated Federal low-income housing tax credit program, California Fair Housing Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, Unlawful Detainer, Invasion of Privacy, forcibly eviction without good cause, and its own house rules.
It will not help residents who has been aggravately assaulted and battered. Instead, it helps criminals covering up crimes and conceal surveillance photos.
Companies Similar to The John Stewart Company
Jamboree Housing Corporat...
Housing Authority of Alam...
“It refuses to refund my security deposition after 62 days when the policy is within 21 days from the...“
Kutxabank
“I wrote an email to Kutxa to inform them that somebody tries to make money using their bank name This...“
SmmFollows
“Every time I put my username and password on SmmFollower, it tells me, 'Your SmmFollows Account Has Been...“
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Your comment is successfully posted.
The John Stewart Company in San Francisco manages low-income housing is supposed to assist the disadvantaged group being in the profitable business. But it is hostile, harassing, and persecuting the residents. Its policy is PROFIT FIRST and RESIDENTS' RIGHTS AND SAFETY LAST.
Everything stated above is true! Since living on property managed by John Stewart Co.
my physical and mental health has diminished greatly. Subjected to mold exposure throughout Christmas, Illegal entry by prop. managers and maintence many times. Property management truly dont care about the tenants.
The non resident- residents have ease of access to property without any repercussions. They steal from tenants and damage the property. The leased residents suffer and hold all responsibility while non leased residents(couch surfers and uninvited parties) enjoy all that the property has to offer. They come and go as they please and have no respect for the property or the tenants on contract.
Management takes no responsibility in tenants security, theft, or anything else. Like it or leave it policy.
I was assaulted and battered by criminals illegally living in the low-income apartment complex managed by The John Stewart Company. The company covers up criminals and conceals surveillance photos refusing to submit the photos to police and court for prosecution.
The company has violated the Federal Low-Income Tax Credit and California programs by "eviction of disabled without good cause", and forcibly charging 63% of rent on disabled resident while it is regulated at 30%.