Socken Law
A company's rating is calculated using a mathematical algorithm that evaluates the information in your profile. The algorithm parameters are: users' rating, number of resolved issues, number of company's responses etc. The algorithm is subject to change in future.
Socken Law Overview
Socken Law has 1.2 star rating based on 5 customer reviews. Consumers are mostly dissatisfied.
- Rating Distribution
Recent recommendations regarding this business are as follows: "Stay informed", "Go elsewhere for wills and estates.".
Consumers are not pleased with Customer service and Diversity of Products or Services. The price level of this organization is high according to consumer reviews.
Media from reviews
Brampton, Ontario
Bad experiences
User's recommendation: Stay informed
Brampton, Ontario
Unethical and anger
Toronto, Ontario
Awful service. Completely incompetent. Save yourself the aggravation by not using his service.
User's recommendation: Go elsewhere for wills and estates.
Unprofessional! Avoids clients and does not return calls
Allan Socken Attempts to Contact Me
Preferred solution: Full refund
Toronto, Ontario
Discrimatory & Unprofessional Socken Law Practice
Preferred solution: Full refund
Companies Similar to Socken Law
Lenore Silverman Attorney
“Lenore is so *** and disorganized, she made huge errors in questioning her own witness. A lawyer should...“
Allegra Learning Solution...
“I received this certificate from a short course offered by the public library in Toronto, Ontario,...“
Greencity International C...
“Very unprofessional and no Humanity Education College that I see in my life. Disappointed since early I...“
Saint Leo University
“On July 15, 2019, I tried logging into my Saint Leo account to retrive my transcripts to send to another...“
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Your comment is successfully posted.
Clearly Mr Socken wants to resolve this matter. We are willing to resolve it with an apology and retraction of slander.
It’s been 6 long years since the incidents in question occurred. Recently I came to the realization, after watching a few high profile trials, that some people won’t change.
And Allan Socken is one of them. He had numerous oppportunities to apologize and he didn’t. Instead he opted to lie and cover his tracks, negatively impacting my mental health in the process. Most recently, I heard from others that he referred to me as crazy.
He cites an incident that occurred in 2012. He claims my claims are frivulous. Allan, I want you to think long and hard about the many words you said to me. Next, I want you to read your statement to LSA where you tried to cover your tracks because you knew those comments would get you into trouble.
Then I want you to redefine crazy. You don’t know anything about me. Don’t cite 2012 and 2013 incidents to prove your point. We are living in 2019.
A lot has changed in these 7 years. If you would like these reviews to go away as i’ve heard you do... all you need to do is apologize. Give me back my dignity that you robbed from me.
You will not get rid of the review by bribing me or by slendering my name.
If you want to simply entertain yourself and others with your jokes about what happened in 2012, I ask you to stop. Think of my mental health and dignity for once.
While I understand your point of view, this should not go on public record. You caused Allan Socken to lose a lot of business.
You slandered his name. You called the LSUC on him. You expect him to apologize?
His admission to this could cost him his career. You should understand the meaning of jokes.