Skip to content
SchoolTalk

SchoolTalk

www.schooltalkdc.org
What is your customer experience with SchoolTalk?

SchoolTalk Overview

The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.

AI insights based on reviews
Rating Distribution

SchoolTalk has a 2.6 star rating based on 1 customer review and consumers are mostly neutral. Reviewers note medium price level, value the Website and Reliability, and express concerns about Diversity of Products and Services and Privacy and Data Security.

Key Takeaways for Future Customers

  • Offers free resources, free seminars, group work, conferences and inhouse trainings.
  • Search SchoolTalk reviews for concerns about training quality and organizational practices.

Negative Feedback / Risk Areas

  • Customer complaints about bias against EL/ELA cultures, favoritism, and mediocre or underqualified instructors.
  • Inflexible grouping, negative interdependence, privacy and data security concerns, and advertising access restrictions reported.

Positive Feedback

Users appreciate free materials, seminars, group activities and the site reliability.

View full overview ›

Turn one complaint into a collective action

PC collective complaint

A Collective Complaint helps you unite consumers dealing with the same issue, such as wrong charges, unexpected fees, damaged items, or misleading promises. It goes beyond a single review by growing stronger with every signature, making it harder to ignore. Once you reach 20 supporters, we’ll send it to the company to encourage a response.

Start Collective Complaint
Somturk S

Advertising Access Permanently Restricted After a requested review of this Page, we confirmed it didn't comply with our Advertising Policies or other standards. You can no longer advertise with this P

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
AI Highlights
  • Advertising access is permanently restricted.
  • A review found non-compliance with policies.
  • Ads remain disabled.

Advertising Access Permanently Restricted After a requested review of this Page, we confirmed it didn't comply with our Advertising Policies or other standards. You can no longer advertise with this Page and ads will remain disabled. This is our final

Preferred solution: Full refund

View full review
Anonymous

Inbred organization

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
AI Highlights
  • Supports DCPS with large contracts for conferences, trainings, and curricula.
  • Trainings are mediocre with underqualified staff and reported bias.

The organization provides support to DCPS but they have huge contracts now for conferences, multipurpose trainings, inhouse trainings, school trainings, onsite consultations, guidance, curricula development and more. This parasitic ngo has a profit mentality and keeps too much info to themselves.

Their trainings are mediocre and led by underqualified instructor. A lead instructor on restorative justice didnt have a 4 year degree because he has LD. The inhouse trainings are populated by inclusion teachers (aides) who also have maybe 2 yr degree. The trainings facilitate hiring for those who didnt attend college.

And there is favoritism for Rr race inclusion but not the other kinds. Its an overt attitude and even the trainer didnt bother to mask that very well but seemed to stoke the attitude. So thats how inbred and then nepitism may perpetuate.

I do get something but come pm the training gets downright snarky and intense and venomous headgames. Do as they say but not as they do Bla-bla

Loss:
$1000
Pros:
  • Teacher led instruction inadequate
  • Free seminars
  • Free resources
Cons:
  • Negative interdependence
  • Play race card
  • Inflexible grouping

Preferred solution: Value real diversity, real humility, real values, real connections to community, and your overlooked overeducated talent pools ignored because they are not Rr card

View full review
1 comment
Guest

There were at least (6) circle exercises. One would have sufficed for an ice-breaker.

The agenda was never clear (there was no board for writing or no writing at all). I understand the emphasis was kinesthetic but there also were no rules on group cooperation, speaking out of turn, speaking excessively, not making snarky remarks or snickering. Time and again we wanted to tie this to educational theory but there were few if any connections made. The impression was the facilitator didn't understand much educational theory, just practice.

There was some group shaming going on. The PM part was rushed and poorly executed. We had a group exercise that involved charting but the directions were vague because the teacher did not model the exercise. Again he allowed this person to show off (she may have taken the class before).

There was some race stuff going on where we should all be treated as equals whether yellow or brown. When I brought up ELL and ELA there was no followup as if subcultures do not matter (except for the major dominant subculture of this region). There was nothing really tying it together and again the last closing out circle was used by the toxic person to take more digs with others snickering. The level of professionalism of the participants was also slack.

The participants were poorly dressed and their attitude was that to work you must look or act as ghetto as possible which actually matches what we see on the ground at some of the schools. So if you were silly enough to expect this to be a real educational seminar, the end result was you were disappointed. While the emphasis appeared at the start to be about community, restorative justice, and victim advocacy, the end result appears to be little really relates to schools and if you were wanting to have useful discussions on contemporary threads with homelessness, language barriers, teen addictions to violence, drugs, or gaming, none of that took place because everyone was being forced to obey and conform.

So there was a real mismatch between the so-called relaxed communitarianism and the actual sense of totalitarianism if you wanted to bring anything up. That is also the trend on the ground with working that if you ask questions, it is used as a way to marginalize the worker and used as fuel for gossip or worse.

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content
  • PissedConsumer is on the Inc. 5000 list

For more information read Blog article