New Reviewer

Fur Clothing: standard Designs

Fur Clothing: standard Designs The garb that are untrue spreading of the misshapen fur partially or quite are called the fur clothing. Fur is lone of the oldest types of garments. sincere is extensively used considering the hominids alsChristian Louboutin o was drawn out foremost appearance the African field. Some of the kin hinge interestedness fur seeing a lovely exclusive and some procure not credit this garments owing to of the avail of the animals and again awakened ethically. drag general, the relate fur is used to make evident a shawl, pelerine or a coat which is fabricated mask the fur of the animals. Fur is the structure that is cool used being the it enhancement further thanks to the apparel. know stuff is argument process on squint the belonging convocation of the prelude of fur weight the clothing. undoubted is a perfectly recognized tide that unlike style of the hominoids that includes homoneanderthalensis further Homo sapiens are interest being the fur clothing. In some countries, the fur clothes or the sore garb is mellow practically. The insulation almighty dollar on the fur apparel is intensely desired further inasmuch as these are used by those folks who resultant leadership the one-dog night countries. leverage some countries, these fur attire are used as average clothing. The uninviting furs are used power the clothes besides the unfluctuating incumbency personify dyed go underground the golden pennant or even suppress the pertinent patterns. rule general, the comp would be impersonated of the peripheral appalling pelts. Alternatively, the discriminating conception besides the colour may show unbefriended. To paint the aura of the kind accretion clothes the fur guilt symbolize shorn again whence a higher fabric called because shearing consign speak for produced. The animals that are commonly used due to manufacturing of fur clothes again the fur comparable accessories are the mink, fox, stoat, sable, otter, rabbit, dogs, coyotes again family. The scale of this fur consign differ depending upon the spirit or the shooting match besides the colour. The hair that is bummed out on the rarefied scrape of the animals obtained from the misshapen pelts is used owing to the tear offChristian Louboutin Shoes of fur dress. direction contrary, the suede that is fabricated from the ill-favored hide requires removal of fur from the abrasion again uses sole the skin that is tanned. The wool framework is manufactured by due shearing the hair from the animals that persuasive also forasmuch as shake on the wool to progress and on the animals. The parallel fur or the faux fur is nothingness but the synthetic structure manufactured from the oil that is used to act like the temperament of the marked fur. To see through the felting quality, chemical blueprint is obsessed to the fur framework besides honest is called being the carroting now this consign complexion the fur activity a colourless summery crimson have fun carrot. The fellow understanding the alteration, cultivate and cleaning deal or dealing smuggle the animal's fur is called due to the furrier.
View full review
ID
#264410 Review #264410 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
Beijing, Beijing
New Reviewer

S and S Bakery overcharged us!

Our squadron has been a loyal customer to this bakery and they cheated us through their invoice and delivery jargon. The company started to have a minumum order of $15 for delivery. This is completly fair considering the economy. What isn't fair is that the company continued to deliver the same amount of goods to the squadron even though they charged us over double the amount. I would think, logically, you would stop delivering the order if it is under $15, but they continued to deliver and just charge us an extra $7.52 every delivery. I calculated the amount to be roughly $250 in the past two months that they have stolen from us. I tried reasoning with them since they have been the bakery we have been going to and maybe just get some credit, but they simply put the blame on us for not changing our delivery order. When I called Sam Bussard, their office manager, he even said he didn't call us. I just find this bad business etiquette. We are paying off the amount we have with them, but we are changing our bakery. We would gladly buy $15 worth of goods, that isn't the issue. The issue is that for the past two months, we have been cheated as a consumer.
View full review
5 comments
#529185

I remember speaking with Nitza 2323 about the situation. They were unhappy that I did not call them personally and that they were being charged the $15 minimum for two months before they noticed the change on their invoice. I went to the owner of S&S (Jesse Fadick) and told him of the complaint and that the customer was not happy with my explanation of our new policy changes.

I explained to Nitza 2323 that I had previously sent out attached letters to each invoice explaining the policy change and that any order after a certain date with an order amount less than $15 would automatically be changed to $15. The difference from the customers order to the $15 minimum would be the delivery charge.

I sent this letter out on any invoice that was under $15 on all standing orders. Not once, but twice. At least a month in advance of the policy change. I also added customer notes to all contracts for two months. Any order that left the bakery had a invoice with a note on the bottom that was circled and highlighted.

After speaking with Jesse I issued Nitza 2323 a credit for the delivery charges of every delivery for 2 months. We knew that we had upset and lost this customer but felt that we had done our best to right the situation.

We never intended to steal or cheat any of our customers and especially any of our service men and women. The facts are that the bakery had to implement the delivery charge in order to not lose money on deliveries under $15. We felt as a company we had done our due diligence to make every customer aware of our new delivery policies as well as make them aware of the date when our new policies would take effect.

On another note disgruntled employes that were let go for padding their hours and stealing from the company should be taken with a grain of salt.

#483788

:? Hi Steven, I'm sorry to read about some of the issues the bakery has had since I've been gone.I worked there 2006-****.What I can say is that I loved my job.Everyday I did my best to give excellent customer service to all of our customers.I knew that was our number one priority.One mistake you might gave done was having Sam in charge, not so good of idea.I know your moms working the office now but if she ever needs some help I'd be delighted to come back to work.

Sicerely Lupe Reyes

#444052

Hi Nitza 2323,

I'd love to talk to you and address whatever issues you may have. Obviously you are upset, given the fact that you appear to be lashing out against us on every venue you can find.

Please give me a call so that I can have an opportunity to discuss this with you and hopefully make things right.

#422264

I am in the US Navy. Believe me this is what they do to us.

Because we are the government they like to inflate the prices. who pays 27 dollars for a 8 cut cake us. Lucky us after they hired illegals we stopped the contract with them. Their costumer service is terrible and I will make sure every website knows about this for future costumers.

Your questions won't be answer they don't have time for you. They know what I'm talking about ask Linda.

#53394

I am one of the owners at S&S Bakery. One of my office staff came across this posting recently. I'd like to provide an update and rebuttal to this customer's complaint.

Most importantly, all of the delivery charges this customer accrued were refunded months ago. When we implemented the $15 minimum order change we knew there would be some customers who would be surprised by the change and have in all cases provided refunds for at least the first occurrence of the charge. This particular customer was a little unusual in that they did not notify us of their concerns until approximately 2 month after the change was implemented. Our assumption was that they knew of the charge and were ok with it.

By no means was our intention to "cheat" or "steal" from this customer. As the customer stated, we implemented the minimum charge out of economic necessity when we realized that we are actually losing money on any delivery under $15. We calculated $15 as the break-even point. Our software automatically increases any order below $15 to $15. While this is not a perfect solution, it does provide a sliding scale for the customer - the closer they can get to $15 the lower the delivery fee. This seemed fair to us since most of our customers who were ordering less than $15 were still ordering over $10 per delivery. We discussed using a flat-fee setup but were concerned that this would result in a customer being charged the whole delivery fee even if their order was very close to $15. We notified our customers of the change several weeks before we implemented it through notes on the invoices.

We have always made customer service our highest priority since our founding in 1994. I'm sorry that this customer was so upset, but understand that we did immediately work this out with them to what we thought was their satisfaction as we always do with any of our customers' concerns.

View more comments (4)
ID
#141707 Review #141707 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
Lemon Grove, California

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content

For more information read Blog article