Posture Pro
Posture Pro Overview
The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.
1.0 star rating from 1 customer review; consumers are mostly dissatisfied with customer service, discounts, and high price level, and a recent recommendation called the company "Your a scam company".
Positive Feedback
There are no positive comments in the available reviews and recent posts focus on delivery, royalty disputes, and product disputes.
Negative Feedback / Risk Areas
- Complaints about nondelivery and poor customer service, with one reviewer saying their package never arrived.
- Allegations of high pricing and unsatisfactory discounts or special offers.
- Legal disputes and patent infringement claims tied to Posture Pro marketing and royalties.
Key Takeaways for Future Customers
- Check recent Posture Pro reviews before purchasing to confirm delivery and service reliability.
- Review Posture Pro customer complaints about customer service and pricing to set expectations.
- Be cautious about refunds and verify seller status when ordering given ongoing legal and royalty disputes.
The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.
1.0 star rating from 1 customer review; consumers are mostly dissatisfied with customer service, discounts, and high price level, and a recent recommendation called the company "Your a scam company".
Positive Feedback
There are no positive comments in the available reviews and recent posts focus on delivery, royalty disputes, and product disputes.
Negative Feedback / Risk Areas
- Complaints about nondelivery and poor customer service, with one reviewer saying their package never arrived.
- Allegations of high pricing and unsatisfactory discounts or special offers.
- Legal disputes and patent infringement claims tied to Posture Pro marketing and royalties.
Key Takeaways for Future Customers
- Check recent Posture Pro reviews before purchasing to confirm delivery and service reliability.
- Review Posture Pro customer complaints about customer service and pricing to set expectations.
- Be cautious about refunds and verify seller status when ordering given ongoing legal and royalty disputes.
Where the *** is my package. You took my money i want my package
This company sucks. They take yoir money and deliver the package you supposedly purchased.YOU SUCK !!
User's recommendation: Your a scam company
Posture Pro Lawsuit Looming
- - Ventura received a warning letter from Geisert, the Posture Pal patent owner, with three options.
- - Ventura chose to keep marketing Posture Pal; royalties and lawsuits may follow.
Posture Pro posture analysis engineer Dr. Joseph Ventura may be slapped with a patent infringement lawsuit or countersued with a patent infringement lawsuit depending on who files first.
Chris Geisert, patent holder of the famous Posture Pal cushion, sent a warning letter to Dr. Ventura regarding his patent rights.
Dr. Ventura was receiving a royalty payment from Posture Pal for use of his science and marketing to his clients who use his Posture Pro software worldwide until the company became defunct and was receiving royalty payments from Bernard Brown who is facing fraud and patent infringement complaints filed with the US Northern District Court of Texas.
Geisert sent a letter to Dr. Ventura giving 3 choices on how he could act regarding Posture Pal.
The first choice was that he could continue to help Posture Pal market the cushion and no longer receive royalties while he markets for Posture Pal.
Patent belonging to Chris Geisert, not Posture Pal meant that Dr. Ventura could be prosecuted for patent infringement.
Documents of the forfeited Posture Pal companies and the official USPTO website showing Geisert as current patent owner was shown to Dr. Ventura.
The second choice was that Dr. Ventura could take down his science regarding Posture Pal and not help either party while still collecting royalties from both parties until the court case was settled, staying neutral.
The third choice given to Dr. Ventura was the option to help Geisert market his invention.
Dr. Ventura chose the first choice, to continue marketing and helping Posture Pal sell knowing the fact that Posture Pal had a patent infringement and fraud lawsuit against Bernard Brown the acting CEO who forfeited the company and was selling product without company representation.
Now that the Posture Pal is no longer sold, Dr. Ventura is demanding payment from Geisert for the products he has sold and is threatening a lawsuit.
Geisert has offered countless times to start paying Dr. Ventura royalties now that he is no longer marketing Posture Pal, but Dr. Ventura demands royalty payments for cushions sold while Geisert wasn't useing Posture Pro marketing materials and was helping a defunct company CEO who was being litigated for fraud and patent infringement.
The continued argument could lead to lawsuits from both sides being filed; one for not paying royalties and the other for patent infringement.
While Geisert has offered to start paying royalties on current merchandise sold in return for marketing, the main hang up for both parties are the cushions that were sold while Dr. Ventura was infringing upon Geisert's patent.
Posture Pro Royalties Stop Due to Patent Infringement
- - Ventura's Posture Pal royalty ended due to patent issues.
- - Geisert warned three options; Ventura chose to market for Brown.
- - They remain at a stalemate.
Posture Pro software engineer Dr. Joseph Ventura's royalty agreement regarding Posture Pal/FHP Cushion has now ended due to patent infringement violations against Dr. Ventura.
Inventor Chris Geisert sent Dr. Joseph Ventura a warning letter regarding marketing and receiving royalties of the patented Posture Pal belonging to Geisert, giving him 3 options of what he could do.
The first option was continue marketing Posture Pal for Bernard Brown who has a fraud and patent infringement lawsuit against him and receive no royalties sold of the FHP Cushion.
The second option was to become a neutral party and receive royalties from both parties until the court case ended.
The third option was to support FHP Products FHP Cushion.
Posture Pro inventor, Dr. Ventura chose to continue marketing for Bernard Brown and not support Geisert which stopped Geisert from paying royalties for the science Ventura offered.
Geisert continued to sell without using Ventura's science or marketing.
Now that the FHP Cushion is selling and Posture Pal is not selling, Ventura is demanding royalties even though he chose to market for Bernard Brown who had a patent infringement and fraud lawsuit.
Geisert offered to start paying royalties now that Ventura stopped promoting Posture Pal but Ventura demands royalties of cushions sold even when he was against Geisert.
Geisert and Dr. Ventura are at a stalemate and will probably not settle without arbitration or going to court.
Ventura was given 3 choices.
1. continue to market for other companies who were infringing upon my patent and not receive royalties from me.
2. become a nuetral party, take down your marketing for both parties and receive royalties from both parties
3. support geisert who had the agreement with and receive his royalties.
ventura chose to support the other company.
I offered to start paying him his royalties after he stopped infringing upon my patent but that wasn't good enough.
Companies Similar to Posture Pro
PostureCo
Saniderm
“I purchased an item from Saniderm website the item was shipped out from Utah, and apparently it got...“
Fragrant Jewels
“My shipment was returned because it was being delivered to my billing address instead of my shipping...“
Jawzrsize
“Package hasnt arrived and I was given a number from this company that went straight to voice mail...“
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Your comment will appear after moderation
I told Ventura I would not pay him royalties while he was infringing upon my patent.
After he stopped infringing, I was glad to start paying him roylaties. Our differences can only be settled by arbitration/court.
Chris
Chris Geisert owes me money for cushions he has sold. He admits he does not have a copy of our agreement, yet is making claims that I violated that agreement. I welcome a lawsuit so I can expose these allegation by Geisert for what they are.