This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

NewDay USA - FALSE DOCUMENTS

NewDay USA - FALSE DOCUMENTS
NewDay USA - FALSE DOCUMENTS
I wasted time gathering my documents. They sent a false letter of approval. I went to purchase a home and the documents were fake. Amazing, this veteran face when I lost the home I wanted to purchase. When I called them the individual no longer worked there. They never apologized to this veteran. My credit score was high..I qualified for the loan...I lost the home.... My forever home was a never home...Some American DREAM... What person/entity would do this to a disabled veteran? DAMN shame...it was not a NEWDAY for me...

User's recommendation: BEWARE WHO YOU DO BUSINESS WITH.

View full review
ID
#3066301 Review #3066301 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Pros
  • Advertise
Cons
  • Its a lie discrimination
Preferred solution
Apology

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

My Auto Inc - A LEMON

My Auto Inc - A LEMON
My Auto Inc - A LEMON
My Auto Inc - A LEMON
Update by user Nov 14, 2021

Andy Rahimzadeh lied on the Attorney General office complaint form now I can proceed in Small Claims court in February 22.I gave Andy a chance to fix the problem and he shunned me off with racist remarks. I had a mediator now he has given me sufficient evidence to pursue this in court.JUSTICE will prevail. Consumers really the YELP reviews from these side hustle...

Original review posted by user Nov 14, 2021
I purchased a vehicle next day red light dashboard and this thief did not want to look at vehicle nor contact me back regarding the vehicle. Andy Rahimzadeh (Andy R) is what he calls himself these days is a con man. He told me to go back where I came from when I wrote a YELP review on him and his business. I hope he says the same in court February 22. I should have reviewed the YELP reviews before giving this thief my hard earned money.

User's recommendation: DO NOT RISK YOUR LIFE.

View full review
ID
#3066170 Review #3066170 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
New York, New York
Cons
  • Poor service and products
Loss
$10
Preferred solution
Deliver product or service ordered

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

Americas Christian Credit Union - RIPPED OFF

Americas Christian Credit Union - RIPPED OFF
Americas Christian Credit Union - RIPPED OFF
Americas Christian Credit Union - RIPPED OFF
Americas Christian Credit Union - RIPPED OFF
I took out a Vehicle loan in 2018, I had insurance. This entity was secretly adding Collateral Insurance on the loan balance. I had to use the BBB to get them to subtract their insurance from the loan balance. They did not subtract when they started in 2018. Now they are harassing me for the YELP review, and filing a complaint. My documents have change and they are harassing me. I want to make consumer aware of their Christian practices and what they have paid back since.

User's recommendation: INVESTIGATE THE NAME OF THE BANK.

View full review
ID
#3066111 Review #3066111 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
New York, New York

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

Jive Turkey - CHECK THE POUNDS FOR A $100

JIVE TURKEY told me that the FRIED turkey I purchased for $100, would feed 15 people and it was 14 pounds. I purchased the turkey at a POP-UP shop on 332 Myrtle Avenue in Brooklyn. THAT was a CLUE, the POP-UP shop did not have 15 varieties only 4 and it wasn't the good ones. I tried returning the turkey that was 7.5 lbs instead of 14 lbs. What a RIP OFF and it was not fried all the way... IT was DISGUSTING, poor communication and customer service, just like a FUNERAL PARLOR..I PAID TOO MUCH FOR SO LITTLE. the turkey was no bigger than my HAIR ROLLER AND NO WIDER THAN IT. BE WARE OF CRIMINALS, THEY come in all sizes and taste. HORRIBLE NO THANK YOU FOR THE GIVING.. YOU JIVE TURKEYS....QUALITY NOT QUANTITY.. NOT..AND THEY WOULD NOT EXCHANGE OR RETURN.. YOU JUDGE! AND THE TURKEY WAS PLACED IN PLASTIC/WITH ITS SAUCE IN A WHITE BOX WITH A CARRYING HANDLE AND NOT TAPED ON THE BOTTOM SO I HAD SIDE WALK TURKEY CRUST ON THE TURKEY. AND ON THE BOX IN STATED 7.5 lbs. WE NEED TO MAKE BUSINESSES ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR RUSHED, POP, AND CARRY OUT. I WILL NOT USE THIS BUSINESS AGAIN. THE TURKEYS THEY GAVE FOR FREE WAS BIGER THAN WHAT THEY FRIED; THEY ARE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE A FANTASTIC TAX WRITE OFF, AND CHARGE US MORE FOR THE PURCHASE..WHAT MORALS..
View full review
ID
#1719691 Review #1719691 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Pros
  • It looked like a turkey i think
Cons
  • Horrible container
  • Did not wash hands open package
  • Poor pricing
Reason of review
Bad quality
Loss
$102
Preferred solution
Full refund

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

Peter DeFilippis And Associates - ACCOUNTABILITY

Peter DeFilippis And Associates - ACCOUNTABILITY
THIS ATTORNEY SABOTAGE MY CASE. OWE ME OVER $75K. HE ASKED ME TO WRITE A REVIEW AND SUE IN WESTCHESTER SUPREME COURT FOR WRITING THE REVIEW ON YELP. HE WANTS TO DISCOUTINUE CASE TO GET RID OF EVIDENCE HE NEVER DISCLOSED YEARS AGO. SHAME ON HIM...
View full review
ID
#1646906 Review #1646906 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Peter Defilippis And Associates Attorney

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

TWU LOCAL 100 - RETALIATION

I WAS ASSAULTED BY MY SUPERVISOR YANICK PILIGRIM ON OCTOBER 4, 2015, AT THE 34TH STREET HUDSON YARD NELSON RIVERA MY UNION REP. HAD KNOWLEDGE AS WELL AS UNION REP MICHAEL HONE WHO IS NOW AN ARBITRATOR. HE ALONG WITH NYC TRANSIT AUTHORITY IS RETALIATING AGAINST ME FOR SPEAKING UP ABOUT THE ASSAULT AND OBTAINING A POLICE REPORT. MICHAEL HONE IS NOW TELING ME HE DO NOT KNOW OF ANY DOCUMENTS CONTAING ASSAULT ON WORKERS. THIS CASE HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE OCTOBER 2015 TO PRESENT. OUR UNION WILL COLLECT AND TAKE YOUR DUES BUT THEY PROTECT THE GUILTY AND WILL NOT FIGHT FOR THE INNOCENT WORKERS. SHAME ON THEM
View full review
ID
#1548813 Review #1548813 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
New York, New York
Reason of review
Work Experience or Job Application

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

Daniel Szalkiewicz And Associates - BROTHERHOOD OF CORRUPTION

Explore video interviews
Peter D. Filippis is using this law firm to sue me for a review he asked me to write and have the nerve to use the initials PD in this law suit WHAT a COWARD; thats why, I now know that he did not disclose information to win my case. Peter wants the record sealed, Peter do not want the public to have the information in the case of Halana Richardson vs. Nicolas Berggruen . I was used and no one cared not Chubb Insurance nor the attorney I hired Peter De Filippis, alias (PD) disgusting and he wants money from me stating he can not get clients and that I ruined HIS reputation. And took the law suit to another venue, that alone smells suspicious. I never really had the RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. AMAZING HOW THEY want to use the LAW for their CORRUPT. When you conspire against and are a part of you are just as GUILTY. YOU ARE THE COMPANY YOU KEEP. IF Peter WINS; IBET he won't use his initials (PD) to sign the check. Peter and this law firm is trying to silence me. and went to another venue to do it WESTCHESTER COUNTY SUPREME COURT case number 53694/2019. You have to read it, ITS ENTERTAINING to say the LEAST. THE SAD PART, he responded to the post on YELP, and wrote some nasty things about me and I did not call the Dobbs Ferry police on him, nor did I sue him, COWARD , and yes YAHWEH will see the both of you and the courts will not defend you.
View full review
1 comment
#1749060

Most Lawyers are liars but look at his last name then you will see why he is a Crook

Featured
ID
#1511063 Review #1511063 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
New York, New York
Service
Daniel Szalkiewicz And Associates Legal Service
Cons
  • No morals
Reason of review
Bad quality

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

Peter DeFilippis And Associates - LAWYER HAVE THE AUDACITY

PETER DE FIPPILLIS, after commenting on my rating of him on YELP, is now trying to sue me for writing true facts about him, and whining to the Westchester Superme Court after he participated in responding to me. He states he paid the websites to take down post and that his peers are looking at him funny at his office, YOU THINK. Nicolas Berggruen rear ended me and fled the scene of the accident, my daughter was in her car seat at the time. Peter took eight years to put me on trial. Mr. Aparacio Fernandes stood in the place for Nicholas Berggruen. Peter Never informed me that Mr. Aparacio Fernandes would fill in for Mr Nicolas Burggruen as the driver that rear ended me. Then Peter told me I owed him $35,000; which was only $15K. The Judge won my case and Peter allowed me to be discredited. Now Peter wants the case sealed and do not want the public to have this information and want the Court to SEAL the records. WHAT THE *** EVER HAPPEN TO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH. PETER is still worrying about his reputation, He is a LIAR, THIEF and his character is capable of anything to cover his *** yet I WILL NOT BE SILENCED. Now Peter is trying to establish me as crazy, vindictive, and malicious and he is so suffering, and you have no morals and complaining to the court, nothing disappears from the WEB, duh. READ THE CASE Halana Richardson vs. Nicolas Bergguren. AND Peter complains his stellar online reputation took a hit when i I made a review on YELP, and BADLAWYER, when he asked me to give the review; so MUCH for HONESTY. WELL I STAND BY MY REVIEW, if he continues to harass me I am going on YOUTUBE, then the WHOLE TRUTH WILL BE OUT, STAY TUNED.
View full review
1 comment
#1671927
This false review is a hoax, scam and scheme fabricated by a former client whose case was successfully resolved 10 years ago. The poster has forced us to defend our hard earned reputation against defamation in a court of law.

We win 99% of our cases and succeeded in this case while facing self-defeating obstacles the client placed in our way. As the founder of an award winning firm for 29 years (https://www.legalrightsadvice.com/awards/) I take pride in our dedication to our clients and integrity, therefore I must respond: You mention your case was won, but then go on to make wholly untrue and 100% false statements a decade after your soft tissue injury matter was settled to your satisfaction, Now you engage in an obsessive, online campaign to coerce money. You have stated a $70,000 + payment to you would be a "preferred solution." Lately you upped your demand to $100,000 and then 1M. These demands clarify your motives for barraging the Internet with untruths though we successfully settled your claims after a full trial and you willfully, executed a general release of all the Defendants.

Despite your victory, you inexplicably caused problems which, if you avoided, may have led to a more beneficial outcome. (1) You unreasonably refused to accept the 2.5 times larger settlement offer from the Defendants insurance company. (2) During the trial, you wrote rambling hand written letters to the Judge, defense attorney and insurance company. The Judge criticized you for this in her written decision and also wrote that the jury did not believe you.

Link attached below. (3) You were not truthful during your cross examination by defense counsel. You were not even honest to the jury about where and with whom your own young children actually lived.


We strongly advised you against those decisions.

You rejected our advice feeling you knew better than experienced trial counsel working for your benefit. In your review you bizarrely accuse us of putting someone else on the stand instead of the individual who rear ended you with the very vehicle he drove daily for a living. During the trial, you sat through his ENTIRE credible testimony without mentioning any doubts that he was the driver. He perfectly matched your description of him from your own testimony.

The man you now strangely claim, ten years later, was driving the other vehicle does not match the description you gave at trial in the least bit. His nationality, hair color and height are totally different than your sworn testimony. You recklessly mention corruption. This is untrue and constitutes defamation.

We have a perfect record of honesty and integrity over three decades. We've not had a single complaint against us of any sort. Based on our ethics we have been named to the Super Lawyers list for the past eight years in a row and have a 10 out of 10 rating with Avvo. We have been named a Gold Champion for client satisfaction by Martindale-Hubbell.

We presented eight witnesses in this soft tissue injury case including your chiropractor, a physician and a vocational rehabilitation specialist. We fought for you every step during an 8 day trial held 4 yrs. after we were hired not 6 or 8 yrs. later as you repeatedly misstate.

We achieved justice for you and the statutory 1/3 legal fee was deducted from the settlement. Not one penny more. Nobody ever told you the fee was "35K" and nobody ever threatened to sue you over the fee.


You could have received 2.5 times more money than the final settlement amount if you simply settled when we advised you to do so.

You alone refused the offer. Deceptively, you always leave that MONUMENTAL fact out of your "reviews."


The truth is that once your defamatory postings began we left ONE SINGLE phone message for you hoping to understand what has brought you to this level of desperation. You refused to respond for a civil discussion. We therefore have had to hire a service that has been successful in writing to web owners to have some of your posts taken down as defamatory.

Nobody ever paid any web site owner to have post removed as you once again recklessly and incorrectly claim. The truth is you posted 11 shocking 1-star reviews, on Yelp alone, accusing four OTHER law firms of various "crimes" against you like "corruption," "stealing," "concealing evidence" and "crimes against children." You even go so far as to accuse a Family Court Referee of potentially, "beating eating [sic] your own children at home." And Yelp has removed four of your prior reviews about us for being defamatory and violating their Terms of Service, yet you continue to post dishonest comments about our Firm while seeking to coerce monetary gain. You ignored the cease and desist letter and accordingly you left us with no choice but to file an Order to Show Cause.


Your "review" of our firm is inaccurate, unfair and mean spirited.

It has no bearing on reality. It's a scam ten years after the case was closed by a client who regrets not accepting a larger offer to settle against our good advice to take it. We are attaching a link to the Judge's decision to refresh your memory about what really occurred in Halana Richardson v. Berggruen: https://casetext.com/case/richardson-v-berggruen-1


Regardless of the content of your posts and that we haven't heard from you since 2008, we do care about the well-being of all our clients.

We will do whatever we can to assist you in understanding, for one example, that both the owner-employer and operator-employee have to be named in a motor vehicle action.

Your scheme is unwise and your time would be better spent with more positive and constructive endeavors. You have our defamation attorneys number and email address if you wish to civilly discuss your concerns.

ID
#1508365 Review #1508365 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Location
New York, New York
Cons
  • Deceitful
  • He was not truthful

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

Metlife Auto And Home Mydirect - TIT FOR TAT

I would not accept MetLife home and auto insurance and they cancelled my life insurance policy and then sent my information to DMV telling them that my vehicle was uninsured. How petty? And metLife's rate was more than the insurance i had on my car, and then they sent my policy payments to a collections agency for payment. AMAZING, corruption at its finest.
View full review
ID
#1459818 Review #1459818 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Metlife Auto And Home Mydirect Auto Insurance
Reason of review
Return, Exchange or Cancellation Policy
Loss
$50000

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
Advanced Reviewer

Liberty Mutual Insurance - PAY FOR WHAT YOU WANT

Liberty Mutual wanted me to pay renters insurance and when I refused they sent the claim to a collection agency, trying to mess up my credit report. My insurance did go up after a BUS hit my vehicle. They stopped sending emails after I would not sign up for direct deposit. Then they changed my auto payment without informing me, now I pay on the 1st of the month because of theirs PETTINESS. I had no liberty and the feeling is MUTUAL, will not use them again. They have poor connections for repairs. I guess i started the commercial ONLY PAY FOR WHAT YOU WANT, amazing. They don't give you the money back after there is no fire and who put this in effect to get over on our customers for higher fees to pay for floods, Natural disasters, theft etc. They charge you enough.
View full review
ID
#1459816 Review #1459816 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Liberty Mutual Insurance Homeowners Policy Claim
Reason of review
Pricing issue
Loss
$2