Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions
Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions Overview
The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.
Overall Customer Rating and Sentiment
Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions has a 1.0 star rating from 1 review and consumers are mostly dissatisfied, reporting serious safety and service concerns.
Positive Feedback
There are no notable positives in the available review; pricing is described as high without value demonstrated.
Negative Feedback / Risk Areas
- Claims of dangerous, negligent mold remediation noted in Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions reviews.
- Customer complaints about refusal to follow IICRC standards and inadequate remediation.
- Billing issues where a $225 charge was applied despite incomplete work.
- Poor customer service and lack of responsiveness to health concerns.
Key Takeaways for Future Customers
- Verify remediation follows IICRC S520 and get written scope before hiring.
- Inspect contracts for billing and refund terms and confirm customer service availability.
- Consider seeking multiple quotes and reading Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions reviews first.
The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.
Overall Customer Rating and Sentiment
Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions has a 1.0 star rating from 1 review and consumers are mostly dissatisfied, reporting serious safety and service concerns.
Positive Feedback
There are no notable positives in the available review; pricing is described as high without value demonstrated.
Negative Feedback / Risk Areas
- Claims of dangerous, negligent mold remediation noted in Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions reviews.
- Customer complaints about refusal to follow IICRC standards and inadequate remediation.
- Billing issues where a $225 charge was applied despite incomplete work.
- Poor customer service and lack of responsiveness to health concerns.
Key Takeaways for Future Customers
- Verify remediation follows IICRC S520 and get written scope before hiring.
- Inspect contracts for billing and refund terms and confirm customer service availability.
- Consider seeking multiple quotes and reading Northeast Ohio Radon and Mold Solutions reviews first.
Turn one complaint into a collective action
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified Reviewer
Dangerously negligent — failed to remove mold properly as required by law.”
- - Sprayed over mold instead of removing contaminated materials per IICRC S520.
- - Owner refused to remove porous insulation and charged $225.
Northeast Ohio Radon & Mold Solutions
My HOA hired Neo Radon to remediate toxic black mold in my attic & insulation, which has made my daughter and me very sick. According to the IICRC S520 professional standard, porous materials like insulation must be removed and discarded not sprayed over.
When I pointed this out, the owner, Dan McClain, refused to do the job, told his crew to leave, and billed me $225 for doing nothing.
Spraying over mold is dangerous, violates national remediation standards, and leaves toxins behind. Mr. McClain knew my family was sick yet chose money over compassion, and ego over integrity.
No family should ever be treated this way ignored, dismissed, and left in a toxic environment by a company claiming to help. Neo Radon & Mold Solutions actions were not only unethical but dangerously negligent.
Im sharing this so others dont go through the same betrayal. Make sure your contractor follows the IICRC S520 Standard and has a heart for the people theyre supposed to protect because this company did not.
The IICRC S520 is the national standard of care recognized by insurance companies, environmental inspectors, and courts.
When a contractor ignores it and simply sprays moldy insulation or drywall, they are: 1. Violating professional remediation protocol
2. Failing to remove the health hazard 3.
Risking occupant exposure to spores and mycotoxins
4.
Potentially committing negligence or misrepresentation if they claim the area is remediated when it is not.
Direct Reference (S520 Section 12.2.1):
Mold-contaminated porous materials should be removed and discarded. Antimicrobial treatments, encapsulates, or coatings are not acceptable substitutes for physical removal.
- Not educated on mold remediation
Preferred solution: Full refund of mold test performed inaccurately and $225 charge removed when you walked off the job!!!!!!!!
User's recommendation: Do not trust North East Ohio mold remediation
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Your comment is successfully posted.