Skip to content
MAKO Design And Invent

MAKO Design And Invent

www.makodesign.com
What is your customer experience with MAKO Design And Invent?

MAKO Design And Invent Overview

The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.

Based on reviews, created with AI
Rating Distribution

MAKO Design And Invent has a 1.0 star rating based on 1 customer review; overall sentiment is strongly negative and consumers are mostly dissatisfied. This is reflected in MAKO Design And Invent reviews where the lone reviewer reports serious issues.

Positive Feedback

No positive aspects were reported in the available review.

Negative Feedback / Risk Areas

  • Designs alleged to infringe on existing products, creating legal risk and potential lawsuits.
  • Refunds denied despite customer dispute, representing a major customer complaints theme.
  • High charges and billing disparities compared with second opinions on CAD work.
  • Reported poor customer service and prioritization of profit over patent considerations.

Key Takeaways for Future Customers

  • Check MAKO Design And Invent reviews and seek independent IP clearance before paying.
  • Obtain written refund and billing terms, and get competitive quotes for design and prototyping.
  • Consider second opinions on CAD and prototype costs and verify customer service responsiveness.
View full overview ›

Turn one complaint into a collective action

PC collective complaint

A Collective Complaint helps you unite consumers dealing with the same issue, such as wrong charges, unexpected fees, damaged items, or misleading promises. It goes beyond a single review by growing stronger with every signature, making it harder to ignore. Once you reach 20 supporters, we’ll send it to the company to encourage a response.

Start Collective Complaint
Laura M Rph

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Do not use this company!

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
AI Highlights
  • - The company focused on money over helping inventors.
  • - I paid about $50k for design and prototype, and the designs infringe on other products.

Inventors BEWARE! I would not recommend this company.

This company is all about the money and not helping inventors. Don’t waste your time and money. I paid this company to design and prototype a product idea (close to $50k). The designs that I paid for , come to find out, are infringing on other products!!

I approached them about this and asked for money back and was told no. I had a feeling in the beginning and I questioned the CEO on infringing and he said the one that gets ahead in the market is what matters not a patent. This is not true...patents matter. Now I’m in a position where if I move forward I will be sued for infringement.

Again for a product this company designed and that I paid for!!! So $50k down the can! Doesn’t make since to me...very unsatisfied and lost a lot of money.

I got a second opinion on CAD design and was quoted $600...they charged me $24,000. I’m not trying to be hateful I just want to save people from making the same mistake!

Loss:
$50

Preferred solution: Full refund

View full review
4 comments
Guest

The client should have researched related patents before getting into expensive design.

Cleta Wzb

I too was totally taken advantage of by Mako Design and Invent. I lost 10,000 dollars.

I was told that the CAD design they had come up with for my product was completely useless and not able to be used for prototyping.

This company is a total fraud. BEWARE

Guest

Thank you for sharing your experience..this is indeed a very negative position to be in. I hope you will at least be able to recover some of your investment... Filing a complain with the BBB should be considered if here are no other options to resolve.

Guest
reply icon Replying to comment of Guest-1834635

Bad deal and sorry you lost your money. My question is if you were infringing your patentability search would have had the prior art.

Or should have if it was done correctly.

Are you saying you were counseled to ignore potential conflicts in favor of market position? Where did the communication breakdown occur as far as expectation vs reality?

View more comments (3)

Unemployment Expert Tips

Experts Tips on Unemployment and Cyber Security

Experts Tips on Unemployment and Cyber Security

Can’t verify your identity via ID.me? Andrew Stettner, an unemployment expert, comments on how the ID.me verification process works and the privacy risks involved. Learn how one consumer resolved his issue.

Andrew Stettner
Andrew Stettner

Andrew Stettner is a senior fellow at TheCenturyFoundation and a non-profit leader who shares expert opinion on unemployment benefits and insurance reform.

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content
  • PissedConsumer is on the Inc. 5000 list

For more information read Blog article