Indepth Polygraphs

Anyone can go to polygraph school and pick up *** certificates ... people must be fact checked them self’s with their outlandish expertise...

Subjecting yourself to any type of test of that nature is asking for serious problems. I'll clear up two false statements first, then go over what I call "trap questions".

A trap question is the art of forming statements around a persons answer, so the person answering has no possible way to get around what the interrogator asks _____________________________________________________________________ False statement #1: (Said on Maury Povich, and The Robert Irvine show) "The lie detector test determined" or "The Lie detector says" Those are false statements simply because a lie detector is nothing but a machine, and a machine is an object, it has no thought process or any possible way to determine anything. The person giving the test has an OPINION on how they feel like reading the machine. It would be exactly like someone saying "My computer told me to eat cake" Sounds silly now that it's put into perspective doesn't it? False Statement #2: (Said by Dan Ribacoff on the Steve Wilkos show) Lie detector tests are not admissible in court because you must be tried by a jury of your peers, and a machine is not a jury of your peers.

I seriously couldn't believe the utter sheer stupidity diarrhea of that Dan spewed out of his mouth. While that was clever wording, it was a total lie. The real reason lie detector test are not admissible in court, is because the US supreme court says a machine itself has no possible way to know the difference between a lie and the truth. It is the exact same thing as verbally asking your computer if onions taste good, and having it answer.

______________________________________________________________ TRAP QUESTIONS: (This is not a real term as I made it up) A trap question is specifically designed to work off the answer/situation someone says or is in. In order for the interrogator or person asking the questions so they are right or get out of having to do something Here is an example: (Pawn Stars had probably the best example) There was an episode where someone brought in an antique rifle, where the original color blue was faded, When giving the usual song and dance estimate rick commented about the blue part something along the lines of "Well collectors like something like this a little restored to have vibrant color" so it's not worth that much. The trap comes into play because had the person came in with the blue restored, Ricks reply would have been totally different and he would have said "You restored the blue", a collector wants them in original condition, so because it has been restored, it isn't worth as much. So no matter what condition the rifle was in, it wasn't worth much.

Another example of a real good trap question was on an episode of the Steve Wilkos show. There was a person who had been accused of something for over a year (So they probably got so numb to it it didnt' really bother them any more" 99.9% of people who get accused of something for that long really just don't have any emotions towards the accusation one way or the other. So because the person at that point after that long was probably so thick skinned, Steve said, someone who was accused of what you were wouldn't' be acting as mellow as you are without hardly any emotion I would be tearing up the stage all mad. But on the flip side of that, if they were acting all out of control Steve would have said "someone innocent won't be acting as crazy as you are right now.

You don't' need to be tearing up the stage just because you're mad Yet Steve himself said that he would have been tearing up the stage in the first example. So anyone is screwed against trap questions not a thing you can do against it.

Someone that people think are upper stature, will use these trap questions to prevent anyone from possibly being able to challenge them as they use that to further boost their reputation. __________________________________________________________

Go check the records at town of oyster bay and also Suffolk county Hux plumber is a crooked contractor

Seems like my town is getting a bad rep due to one block and its "PVTEYE" Let's not hide behind an Alias-Get it out there...and be honest. Yet another homeowner moved due to the drama.

Get over it and leave this guy alone. You should have been charged double just to deal with you~ #37

Dennis DeBernardis is a CONVICT! Phony polygraph examiner who uses the false name of Barry Kaufman, so people won't google his real name see that he is FEDERAL PRISON CONVICT!

So this Marilyn lady who failed two polygraphs from real certified examiners and then says she passed a polygraph from a CONVICTED FELON with ZERO polygraph credentials just shows what a big liar she really is.

Liar Liar Liar!

Let's not forget that this woman failed two polygraphs and then scammed her husband by going to a "fake" polygraph examiner who is a convicted federal criminal! He gave her a passing score! How full of BS does that make her story! There is no such polygraph examiner as Barry Kaufman! It is a fake name used by Dennis DeBernardis, who is fake polygraph examiner and convict!

So everyone needs to stop taking the word of Marilyn....who is not really Marilyn from NJ. She is a little Asian woman from Brooklyn!

All she does is lie and blame others!

https://antipolygraph.org/blog/tag/dan-ribacoff/ American Polygraph Association Declines Comment as More Racist Text Messages by Member Daniel Ribacoff Surface Dirty Cops & PIs blog founder and editor Jeffrey Augustine reports on newly discovered racist text messages attributed to disgraced polygraph operator Daniel Ribacoff in an article titled, “Trouble for Polygraph Expert Dan Ribacoff as More Racist Texts Surface.” Both AntiPolygraph.org and Dirty Cops & PIs previously reported on a different set of racist text messages sent by Ribacoff. The new racist text messages are associated with Ribacoff’s business’s California telephone number, +131********.

One of the newly reported racist text messages associated with Daniel Ribacoff’s California cell phone number (Dirty Cops & PIs blog image) For his report, Augustine contacted the American Polygraph Association—of which Ribacoff is an associate member—”for comment regarding Ribacoff’s alleged racist text messages and their implications for the polygraph industry.” American Polygraph Association President Roy Ortiz (APA photo) In reply, American Polygraph Association president Roy Ortiz “stated that the APA does not comment on matters involving litigation.” It is noteworthy 1) that Augustine’s inquiry was not limited to litigation that Ribacoff faces, 2) that the American Polygraph Association is not a party to that litigation, and 3) that the American Polygraph Association bylaws include no such restriction on commentary. In 2003, American Polygraph Association president Roy Ortiz, then an APA director and the chief of the Los Angeles Police Department’s polygraph unit, was the subject of specific and credible allegations of corruption. American Polygraph Association Director Lisa Ribacoff (APA photo) Augustine also notes that Daniel Ribacoff’s daughter and business associate, Lisa Ribacoff, is a director of the American Polygraph Association: In the course of our research, we discovered that Dan Ribacoff’s daughter, Lisa Ribacoff, is a current director and board member of the American Polygraph Association. Given the serious implications of the racist messages allegedly sent by the father and CEO of Lisa Ribacoff’s company, and in order to maintain a minimal level of integrity, the APA should require Ms.

Ribacoff to recuse herself from participating as a Director of their organization. Augustine’s article may be read in full here.

They are reliable. More reliable than a lying and cheating wife!

That is for sure. It is every bodies business when she posts nonsense on the internet blaming others for her actions!