Goldsmiths Lawyers
We are currently gathering insights to provide in-depth statistics
Consumers are asking for reviews of this business
Barrie goldsmith, goldsmiths lawyers, consumer interests, anonymous reviews
It appears there are multiple anonymous reviews as well as commentary relating to the conduct of Barrie Goldsmith from Goldsmiths Lawyers in Sydney, Australia.
In light of the comments and questions submitted, it would be fair to assume that the intention of the reviews, questions and general enquiries relating to Mr Goldsmith is to obtain Mr Goldsmith's insight and responses relating to various client's experiences and the views of the courts in multiple matters, allowing him a fair opportunity to correct the record if the information is inaccurate or false in any way.
It is only reasonable to assume that any failure to respond to questions is an acknowledgment of the difficulty Mr Goldsmith must be experiencing in disclosing information he may consider to be challenging to address in a positive or forthcoming manner.
The observation that the reviews were submitted anonymously seems to be an indication that the intention of the writer is to focus the attention on the accuracy of the content, asking relevant questions, addressing questionable conduct, evaluating responses and the truthfulness of Mr Goldsmith and the professional capacity he appears to exercise.
It seems obvious that if he can't defend himself competently and articulate a reasoned explanation of his conduct, what chance does he have in defending his clients?
The reviews seem to allow the reader to be able to evaluate the accuracy and factual basis of various conduct identified rather than be distracted by irrelevant outbursts, tantrums and issues not relating to the veracity of the information being reviewed.
Interestingly and historically, it appears, this was the same sensible and reasoned approach the founding fathers of America exercised while attempting to ratify the U.S. Constitution with the guidance of writing The Federalist Papers.
Although they utilized the pseudonym "Publius", it would be reasonable to assume they wanted to maintain anonymity, to attempt to prevent unorthodox intervention in their positive historical moment, which may be viewed as an attempt to break free from the deception, oppression and the intimidation tactics of British interests.
It appears as no surprise that Mr Goldsmith is British and may well want to pull these trusty old tricks out of his British toolbox.
Once again Mr Goldsmith, let's close the book on the trickery.
Please be more forthcoming and truthful with your responses to questions that are relevant to prospective consumers.
$7000 unauthorised charge, Goldsmiths lawyers, barrie goldsmith, credit card transaction dispute
Goldsmiths Lawyers and Barrie Goldsmith subject to dispute over $7000 credit card charge.
Dr Ghosh v Baycorp Collections PDL Aust Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1727 (4 December 2014)
austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2014/1727.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Ghosh
The matter has dealt with claims made regarding various issues, generally including, Goldsmith's Lawyers Goldsmiths lawyers Barrie goldsmith Unauthorized credit card debit, $7000 unauthorized charge, legal fees disputed, sydney lawyer debited credit card without consent.
A current rip off report appears to have summarized the key issues in Dr Ghosh v Baycorp Collections PDL Aust Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1727 at paragraph 3 where Schmidt J highlights......
"The amended summons on which Dr Ghosh now proceeds claimed, amongst other things, that the defendant had obtained the default judgment in the Local Court for $14,722.46 in respect of a credit card bill claimed to be owed to the NAB; that the claim related to a claimed $7,000 debit to Goldsmith Lawyers, for which they had no authority to debit to her credit card; that Dr Ghosh had paid the disputed sum to the NAB, which had debited a further $7,000, instead of reversing the debit, and froze the card, before she travelled overseas; that fraud had been reported to police in March 2011"
It appears the consumer review (link below) also contains some sensible general reflection on life experiences and some sound cautionary advice for anyone generally interested in avoiding disputes of this sort.
ripoffreport.com/r/Goldsmiths-Lawyers/internet/Goldsmiths-Lawyers-Goldsmiths-lawyers-Barrie-goldsmith-Unauthorized-credit-card-debit--121****
See paragraph 3 on link below to understand context of issues raised relating to Barrie Goldsmith of Goldsmith Lawyers
austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2014/1727.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Ghosh
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Barrie goldsmith, goldsmith lawyers, legal services commissioner
On 7 October 2014, in the Supreme Court of Queensland, in the matter of Lakaev v The Age Company Ltd Anors, Her Honour, Justice Jean Dalton (in reference to the conduct of Goldsmiths Lawyers and Barrie Goldsmith) stated the following;
"why should I not refer your firm’s conduct to the Legal Services Commissioner in Queensland? The plaintiffs have been left in an appalling situation where there was no proper preparation for this trial. It seems that almost no assistance was given in terms of trying to find a barrister who would act on spec. Everything seems to have been left up to the plaintiff to try and find some kind of representation. At the very least, Mr Goldsmith ought to have, I would have thought, terminated the relationship between himself and your client. That’s so far as his duty to your client is concerned. So far as the duty to this court is concerned, I find it absolutely extraordinary that he would have appeared on the 26th and 28th of August this year knowing that there were no proper arrangements in place for representation of the plaintiff at this trial, and knowing that – well, not knowing of any fact which was likely to change in that regard and yet urged me to keep the trial dates in place, urged me very strongly to keep the trial dates in place. I cannot see on the face of it that he has acted in accordance with his duty either to his erstwhile client, Ms Lakaev, or this court."
Mr Goldsmith, this conduct falls well short of the expectations people place in Lawyers. We encourage you to have a good hard look at yourself and improve your conduct and consider the consequences your questionable professional conduct has on hardworking, everyday Australians. People deserve better.
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Barrie goldsmith disputes online review, threatens legal action
Mr Goldsmith,
Your response is nonsense.
It appears your poker face seems to be wearing thin. Maybe it's time to revert back to your dusty Kenny Rogers album and listen to "The Gambler" a few times.
In consideration of your assertions relating to your conduct referred to by Justice Jean Dalton, please respond to the question below.
Please confirm whether Her Honour Justice Jean Dalton (in response to your firms submissions by Ms Chou relating to your conduct) in the Supreme Court of Queensland on 7 Oct 2014 stated the following;
"Well, I will direct the registrar to make a copy of all the material filed on Thursday of last week which was the 2nd October and today, and to send that, along with a transcript of the proceedings on Thursday of last week and today, to the Legal Services Commissioner for his attention in relation to Mr Goldsmiths’ conduct."
Furthermore, please confirm the outcome of the referred conduct to the Legal Services Commissioner of Queensland by this highly respected Judge, if the above quoted content is correct.
Let's stop the trickery. Let's also stop skimming over the substance of people's concerns and deal with things in good faith. Maybe this is why there's concerns from people to encourage others to keep things in writing, let's also start working on the rebuilding of trust and transparency.
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Washington, District Of Columbia
Barrie goldsmith, goldsmith Lawyers
Mr Goldsmith,
Thank you for your response. We are currently reviewing the information you have provided for its accuracy and truthfulness. Can you please confirm that Her Honour Justice Jean Dalton did not comment on, refer to, or indicate in any way that she was concerned about your conduct?
Please also confirm that she did not verbally indicate at any stage in that matter that she was intending to refer your conduct to the Legal Services Commissioner of Queensland.
We apologize in the interim if the above is inaccurate while summarising the news article referred to, however, we need your assistance to identify the inaccurate details of the review to correct the record.
Please be assured that we are only interested in referring to and/or summarising accurate and truthful information that can be verified.
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Barrie goldsmith, goldsmiths lawyers, client dispute, legal fees
Mr Goldsmith,
Did you represent Natasha Lakaev as Plaintiff in legal proceedings against The Age Newspaper in the Supreme Court of Queensland?
Did you have a dispute with this client over legal fees and/or unpaid invoices?
Did you string this client on in relation to providing legal services in an attempt to earn more legal fees?
Did Her Honour Justice Jean Dalton, in the Supreme Court of Queensland comment on 7 October, 2014;
"The situation seems to me to be one where Mr Goldsmith would neither commit to preparing his client’s case for this trial and representing his client at this trial, nor would he relinquish his position as solicitor. He, as I have said in my earlier reasons, in effect, strung the plaintiff along, perhaps in the hope of
earning some more fees, perhaps for other reasons."
We would appreciate your input as we only want to communicate accurate information.
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Barrie Goldsmith Goldsmith lawyers referred to Legal Services Commissioner
Barrie Goldsmith of Goldsmith Lawyers was referred to disciplinary and professional administrative body for conduct in relation to a matter in court.
His conduct was referred to the Legal Services Commissioner for review by highly respected Supreme Court of Queensland Judge, Her Honour, Justice Jean Dalton.
Justice Jean Dalton is not only highly respected for her professional integrity, high ethical standards, depth of knowledge and capacity to deal with complex areas of law, but also her fortitude and her capacity to deal compassionately with the people of Queensland.
Thank you Justice Jean Dalton for identifying conduct that clearly needs to be reviewed by the professional disciplinary body for lawyers.
Justice Jean Dalton's service to Law in Queensland is appreciated and respected.
http://www.glj.com.au/76-Category?cat=233&year=2014
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Replying to
Brooklyn, New York
Barrie Goldsmith experiences goldsmith lawyers
If possible, please provide details of any experiences dealing with Barrie Goldsmith of Goldsmith Lawyers in Sydney, South Wales, Australia.
We are interested in his conduct relating to his dealings with clients, his reliability and the credibility of his assurances, both oral and written.
We are open to receiving information involving both positive and constructive feedback relating to legal services provided. this information must be truthful.
We are also very interested in any clients that have had immigration related matters in the last 5 years or people originating from China, Phillipines, Indonesia, Sri Lanka or India that have dealt with Mr Goldsmith.
We are only interested in honest, accurate statements from people with direct, first hand experiences. Please respond directly to this enquiry.
I had to deal with Mr Barrie Goldsmith in NSW and I must say his conduct during COVID-19 was below par and I had lodged a formal complaint with Law Commission of NSW. Will advise you of the outcome
Somerset, New Jersey
Goldsmith Lawyers Barrie Goldsmith Sydney Avoid Expensive Unsuccessful litigation
Unsuccessful litigation is extremely expensive.
It is important to know the history of any legal practitioner you may want to use for legal matters.
I have researched sydney law firms and can't find much information about Barrie goldsmith or goldsmith lawyers.
Did goldsmith lawyers or Barrie goldsmith really bankrupt a client where they did not pay the legal fees that were charged?
It does not seem like a very accommodating client approach to sue a client and to bankrupt them if they do not have money when demanded. Does anybody know if his was true?
If goldsmith lawyers or Barrie goldsmith did bankrupt a client or sue a client, I don't think I would want to be the person who recommended this lawyer to that person.
It would be helpful if there is anybody who has had dealings with goldsmith lawyers or Barry goldsmith who could give insight. It would also be useful if there are any recommendations on whether or not to use this law firm from other people's past experiences.
Preferred solution: Let the company propose a solution
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Sydney, New South Wales
Response by Goldsmiths Lawyers to review #619323
This review is a total distortion of what happened. Legal action is being taken because of the false and defamatory nature of the review. The review is based upon comments made by a Judge who (justifiably so) was concerned by the increasing legal costs of the case. Most costs were incurred as a result of an application by the defendant to strike out the claim which was allowed by a Registrar but which decision was successfully appealed against. The client considered that he had been seriously defamed and was determined to take the matter to trial to obtain indication.
The Court of Appeal judgment can be found at - http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nt/NTCA/2012/5.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=title(williams%20and%20melky%20)
Barrie Goldsmith
Goldsmith Lawyers
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is "Barrie Goldsmith from Goldsmith Lawyers" complaining of material being reported that is a distortion of what happened?
It appears the Judge is commenting on the trivial nature of a matter where tens of thousands had been incurred in legal costs?
Is the distortion the trivial nature of the matter or the value of legal services provided?
If so, please explain what the judges questions were?
Barrie goldsmith goldsmith lawyers Sydney Law Firm
$80000 damages and costs ordered against client represented by Barrie goldsmith from Goldsmith's lawyers.
Barrie goldsmith from goldsmith's lawyers upon review appears to have a long list of matters where he has been the legal representative lawyer from a sydney law firm Goldsmith's lawyers and acted for a client that has been unsuccessful in litigation and have been ordered to pay damages.
Sydney law firm and or Goldsmith's lawyers and Barrie goldsmith May also view the outcome as unsuccessful, especially where the defendant have been ordered to pay amounts of money which they would probably not like very much after having Barrie goldsmith from Goldsmith's lawyers act as their legal representative from a sydney law firm. It seems that there could be better wayS to deal with disputes then just pay lawyers lots of money, especially where the defendant is the party left the owing money.
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Kalgoorlie, Western Australia
Lawyer failed lawsuit Barrie goldsmith sydney goldsmith lawyers sydney
Unsuspecting consumers be aware.
Please do due diligence if you look for lawyer in sydney.
Please do not pay too much money, Barrie goldsmith sydney and goldsmith lawyers sydney cost a lot of money for unsuccessful legal action. Very
Expensive
Make sure to check with other lawyers and do research.
Nobody wants to get into a transaction with a lawyer and lose everything they have from the legal fees. Sometimes it may be cheaper to go to court yourself and lose rather than get Barrie goldsmith from Barrie goldsmith lawyers to go to court and win.
Be careful. Don't give away life savings. There are much better ways to throw away your money than by giving it to a greedy person.
God bless
Agreed
Darwin, Northern Territory
Barrie goldsmith unreasonable legal fees out of pocket defamation
Northern territory Supreme Court.
Barrie goldsmith from Barrie goldsmith lawyers representing party who allegedly had imputations made that they were a bad sport. After $30000 dollars was paid to barrie goldsmith for the "great sport" remark, the court suggested the parties resolve dispute.
But if the parties resolve dispute, how will barrie goldsmith from goldsmith lawyers make money?
How does barrie goldsmith make money of individuals don't waste $30000 plus on trivial remarks made that allegedly impute someone is a "bad sport".
Excessive legal fees for a silly trivial matter that probably should not be in court.
Shame on you barrie goldsmith. the legal profession should do better.
Australian defamation lawyers barrie goldsmith excessive legal fees
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Companies Similar to Goldsmiths Lawyers
Zarzaur And Schwartz
“I'm dealing with the IRS &;;;; State,I will make a payment next Friday,on the 5th, sorry for this,u...“
Berkman Bottger Newman an...
“STAY AWAY FROM THIS LAWYER! her and BERKMAN BOTTGER were not even good divorce lawyers when I had them 5...“
Richard Adams Associates
“Let me tell you about these peoples abusive practice they prey on the poor Latin population of South...“
Cordell And Cordell
“Lawyer that was assigned my case was not aggressive and my new Attorney has to undo everything she...“
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Your comment is successfully posted.
I want to cancel my order immediately. No where is there information to do this.
Please help me with this information.
I can be contacted at das0807@***.net. Thank you
Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A150****, due to allegedly false statements made on Pissed Consumer, among other websites. Plaintiff has served a subpoena on Opinion Corp, the company that owns and operates this website, for contact information pertaining to the author of this review.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before September 9, 2015, by emailing us at DefLaw@***.com.
Mr Goldsmith,
I have to admit, a little while ago, I did watch the movie Braveheart and I do think Mel Gibson did do a fantastic job.
As it's been a while since I saw that movie, please remind me in which part of the movie he ran away from the tough questions and refused to answer anything where he may have had some explaining to do?
We do not propose to dignify these further false, defamatory and scurrilous allegations by responding further to them other than to make perfectly clear that they are all made by the same pathetic, cowardly individual who persists in hiding behind the cloak of anonymity. Come forward you coward, if you are so confident in the truth of the garbage that you write.
Barrie Goldsmith
Goldsmiths Lawyers