filters
state:
Show
city:
Show
It appears there are multiple anonymous reviews as well as commentary relating to the conduct of Barrie Goldsmith from Goldsmiths Lawyers in Sydney, Australia. In light of the comments and questions submitted, it would be fair to assume that the intention of the...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

Mr Goldsmith,I have to admit, a little while ago, I did watch the movie Braveheart and I do think Mel Gibson did do a fantastic job. As it's been a while since I saw that movi...

#653709
Reply to reviews
Mr Goldsmith, Your response is nonsense. It appears your poker face seems to be wearing thin. Maybe it's time to revert back to your dusty Kenny Rogers album and listen to "The Gambler" a few times. In consideration of your assertions relating to your conduct...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

In relation to the Lakaev case, allegations were made, at the very beginning of October 2014 ,in an extremely belated attempt by her to obtain an adjournment of the trial that...

#651643
Reply to reviews
Goldsmiths Lawyers and Barrie Goldsmith subject to dispute over $7000 credit card charge. Dr Ghosh v Baycorp Collections PDL Aust Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1727 (4 December 2014)...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

There can be no doubt that the review that Dr Ghosh has now provided to you is false, and is false to her knowledge. There can also be no doubt that she has published the rev...

#651589
Reply to reviews
On 7 October 2014, in the Supreme Court of Queensland, in the matter of Lakaev v The Age Company Ltd Anors, Her Honour, Justice Jean Dalton (in reference to the conduct of Goldsmiths Lawyers and Barrie Goldsmith) stated the following; "why should I not refer your...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

In relation to the Lakaev case, allegations were made, at the very beginning of October 2014 ,in an extremely belated attempt by her to obtain an adjournment of the trial that...

#651543
Reply to reviews
Mr Goldsmith, Did you represent Natasha Lakaev as Plaintiff in legal proceedings against The Age Newspaper in the Supreme Court of Queensland? Did you have a dispute with this client over legal fees and/or unpaid invoices? Did you string this client on in relation to...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

In relation to the Lakaev case, allegations were made, at the very beginning of October 2014 ,in an extremely belated attempt by her to obtain an adjournment of the trial that...

#651074
Reply to reviews
Mr Goldsmith, Thank you for your response. We are currently reviewing the information you have provided for its accuracy and truthfulness. Can you please confirm that Her Honour Justice Jean Dalton did not comment on, refer to, or indicate in any way that she was...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

Mr Goldsmith,You have failed to respond specifically to the above questions. We note you have responded with convoluted ramblings relating to your perspective on the matter wh...

#651057
Reply to reviews
Barrie Goldsmith of Goldsmith Lawyers was referred to disciplinary and professional administrative body for conduct in relation to a matter in court. His conduct was referred to the Legal Services Commissioner for review by highly respected Supreme Court of Queensland...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

#646199
Reply to reviews
If possible, please provide details of any experiences dealing with Barrie Goldsmith of Goldsmith Lawyers in Sydney, South Wales, Australia. We are interested in his conduct relating to his dealings with clients, his reliability and the credibility of his assurances,...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

#643112
Reply to reviews
This review is a total distortion of what happened. Legal action is being taken because of the false and defamatory nature of the review. The review is based upon comments made by a Judge who (justifiably so) was concerned by the increasing legal costs of the case....
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is "Barrie Goldsmith from Goldsmith Lawyers" complaining of material being reported that is a distortion of what happened?It appears the Ju...

Anonymous
Anonymous

In Rural & General Insurance Broking Pty Limited v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2009] ACTSC 67 (18 June 2009), at paragraph 88, Penfold J found, "88. Mr G...

#641007
Reply to reviews
Northern territory Supreme Court. Barrie goldsmith from Barrie goldsmith lawyers representing party who allegedly had imputations made that they were a bad sport. After $30000 dollars was paid to barrie goldsmith for the "great sport" remark, the court suggested the...
Read more
Anonymous
Anonymous

Please take notice that Barrie Goldsmith (“Plaintiff”) has initiated an action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (OH), case number A1504584, due to allegedly false ...

Anonymous
Anonymous

In Rural & General Insurance Broking Pty Limited v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2009] ACTSC 67 (18 June 2009), at paragraph 88, Penfold J found, "88. Mr G...

#619323
Reply to reviews