New Reviewer

Eccleston Law Offices PC False Advertising, Fear Mongering, Exploits Elderly

Eccleston Law firm and James Eccleston use the internet and newspaper ads to advertise lies and soread fear about good companies so potential customers will call him to see what's wrong. This works especially well on the elderly who don't use the internet and still read the newspapers. When the elderly call Eccleston's law office they try to pry personal and confidential information out of them such as checking account info and credit card numbers for them to get at the elderly callers money to pay their legal fees. After they advertise a free consultation with no fees unless they recover money they presure you to pay an upfront fee of $1,500 plus any future expenses. They use scare tactics with the elderly asking them, "how will you live if the company we're going after loses all your money?" "How will you survive?" "You'll be a burden on your children." He's shameless in the methods he employs but he keeps getting away with it. The ABA has a horrible reputation of policing their members because lawyers don't go after lawyers, it's like honor amongst thieves. Hopefully this post will prevent others from falling victim to this predatory lawyer. If he can't make a living ripping people off maybe he'll get a job where he can make an honest living. If you see one of his ads recognize it for the *** job that it is and don't put yourself in financial jeopardy. Once he has you bank account info or credit card info he won't stop billing you. If you cancel your accounts he'll keep racking up the bills and he'll put a lien on your property. His company treats clients like a cash machine. When you see him coming......RUN!
View full review
1 comment


A lawsuit has been commenced in which your identity is relevant. The lawsuit involves claims against George Dobbs, David Lerner Associates, Inc., and David Lerner (collectively, the “Defendants”).

The lawsuit is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in San Francisco. The Court has assigned the case the following case number: C-12-0****SI.

The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit seek to determine whether one of the Defendants posted this anonymous post: Review #245471 on If one of the Defendants did publish Review #245471, the Plaintiffs also seek additional information about the post, the registration of the user known as “Jarvis,” and communications between Consumer Opinion LLC and the person who posted Review #245471. The Plaintiffs are attempting to obtain this information through various discovery requests sent to non-parties.

On April 15, 2016, the Plaintiffs served Consumer Opinion LLC with a Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information or Objects or To Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (the “Subpoena”).

The Subpoena asks Consumer Opinion LLC to produce the following information:

1. If Review #245471 was posted by a computer with the remote IP address, produce all subscriber, poster, or member information and details for the individual or individuals using the posting identity “Jarvis” on the website. The information requested includes, but is not limited to: first name; last name; usernames and aliases; passwords; email addresses; home and work addresses; zip code; and home, work, and cellular telephone numbers. 2.

If Review #245471 was posted by a computer with the remote IP address, produce all communications in 2012 between Consumer Opinion LLC or its predecessor, Opinion Corp., and the user who posted Review #245471, together with all records that indicate the date and time when each such communication was sent and received. 3. If Review #245471 was posted by a computer with the remote IP address, produce all records indicating the duration of the user session when Review #245471 was posted to The Subpoena asks Consumer Opinion LLC to produce the above-listed information no later than April 29, 2016, at Peiffer Rosco Wolf Abdullah Carr & Kane, APLC, at 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400, San Francisco, CA 94111.

The Subpoena has been served on Consumer Opinion, LLC. Unless you move to quash the Subpoena, Consumer Opinion LLC may produce the documents requested by the Plaintiff. You may wish to consult an attorney to advise you about the foregoing.

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO TIMELY AND ANONYMOUSLY FILE AND SERVE A RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE SUBPOENA. Counsel for Plaintiff may be reached at: Jonathan Ball Ball Law Corporation One Market, Spear Tower, 36th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 4**-**9-0721 jb@***

#245471 Review #245471 is a subjective opinion of poster.
West Milford, New Jersey

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content

For more information read Blog article