Dr Gary Tunsky

This is one of those times where one should learn the facts before bashing the reputation of an incredibly brilliant and compassionate man. His protocol had nothing to do with his death.

He might have had a criminal record before but I believe him to be a changed person, he has been humbled and admits to being wrong about things and when a person needs modern trauma care. It takes these types of things to grow a full individual that knows both sides and can deal with the whole person. You can watch how he has obviously changed in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJcDs8xCXzk He also addresses the doctor title.

He isn't licensed in anything. Not a doctor and not even married to his so called wife. Guy is smart but he is not authorized, licensed, certified or trained in any area.Nearly killed my girlfriend with his protocol.

Count One of the indictment charged that he and other defendants conspired together to possess with the intent to distribute and to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. Some of the co-defendants pled guilty pursuant to plea agreements.

Phenicie and three other co-defendants were tried by a jury. That trial ended in a conviction for one of the defendants and mistrials for Phenicie and the other co-defendants. On August 21, 1989, Phenicie went to trial again on these charges. He was convicted on August 23, 1989.

He was sentenced to 189 months. 3 At trial, numerous co-defendants testified against Phenicie.

First, Danny Lanham testified that he bought cocaine from Nickalaus Phenicie, Randy Hughes and Gary Tunsky three times in May, 1987 at Randy Hughes' parents' home in Glen Burnie, Maryland. Some time after those transactions, Hughes and Tunsky were arrested. In June, 1987, Lanham spoke to Nickalaus Phenicie about Hughes' and Tunsky's arrests and about the further purchase of cocaine.

Phenicie indicated that he was happy that they were arrested because he did not like the way they had set up their business. He also told Lanham that he would continue to supply him with cocaine.

After this conversation, Lanham met with Nickalaus Phenicie and Phenicie's brother Chris at Lanham's town house in Glen Burnie, Maryland. At that time, Nickalaus delivered cocaine to Lanham, and told Lanham that if Lanham needed more cocaine, he, Nickalaus, would send the cocaine from his home in California to his brother Chris in North Carolina who would then take the cocaine to Maryland.

935 F.2d 1288

Unpublished Disposition

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Nickalaus Edward PHENICIE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-5247.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued March 8, 1991. Decided June 20, 1991. NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P.

36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Hiram H. Ward, Senior District Judge.

(CR-89-45-S) John David James, Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James, Harkavy & Lawrence, Greensboro, N.C., for appellant. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, N.C. (Argued), for appellee; Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, N.C., on brief.

M.D.N.C. AFFIRMED. Before K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge, JAMES C.

HILL, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation, and TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: 1 Nickalaus E. Phenicie appeals his conviction for conspiring to possess cocaine and distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs.

841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). He contends: (1) that it was error for the trial court to preclude defense counsel from cross-examining co-conspirator government witnesses about their understanding of the federal Sentencing Guidelines and about the sentences they might receive as a result of their cooperation with the government; (2) that there was a fatal variance between the crime charged in the indictment and the evidence presented at trial; (3) that he was sentenced improperly under the Sentencing Guidelines; and (4) that the guidelines are unconstitutional. We find the trial to be free of reversible error and therefore affirm. I.

2 Nickalaus Phenicie was indicted in the Middle District of North Carolina. Count One of the indictment charged that he and other defendants conspired together to possess with the intent to distribute and to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. Some of the co-defendants pled guilty pursuant to plea agreements. Phenicie and three other co-defendants were tried by a jury.

That trial ended in a conviction for one of the defendants and mistrials for Phenicie and the other co-defendants. On August 21, 1989, Phenicie went to trial again on these charges. He was convicted on August 23, 1989. He was sentenced to 189 months.

3 At trial, numerous co-defendants testified against Phenicie. First, Danny Lanham testified that he bought cocaine from Nickalaus Phenicie, Randy Hughes and Gary Tunsky three times in May, 1987 at Randy Hughes' parents' home in Glen Burnie, Maryland. Some time after those transactions, Hughes and Tunsky were arrested. In June, 1987, Lanham spoke to Nickalaus Phenicie about Hughes' and Tunsky's arrests and about the further purchase of cocaine.

Phenicie indicated that he was happy that they were arrested because he did not like the way they had set up their business. He also told Lanham that he would continue to supply him with cocaine. After this conversation, Lanham met with Nickalaus Phenicie and Phenicie's brother Chris at Lanham's town house in Glen Burnie, Maryland.

At that time, Nickalaus delivered cocaine to Lanham, and told Lanham that if Lanham needed more cocaine, he, Nickalaus, would send the cocaine from his home in California to his brother Chris in North Carolina who would then take the cocaine to Maryland. Lanham

sounds like Mail Fraud and you should contact:

District Attorney

USPO

Lawyer

Dr. Gary Tunsky correctly diagnosed me with high lead levels in my blood, and referred me to a chelation doctor.

He did not charge me a cent. I believe he had a hand in saving my life.

Not only did I have high lead, I was also anemic, rundown and burned out. It took a year of nutrition treatment and supplements to get my health back again, but I did it.