Skip to content
Cunningham Energy

Cunningham Energy Reviews

www.cunninghamenergy.com
What is your customer experience with Cunningham Energy?

Cunningham Energy Overview

The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.

AI insights based on reviews
Rating Distribution

Cunningham Energy has a 1.0 star rating from 1 review with 100% unfavorable ratings; consumers report high prices, poor reliability, and dissatisfied customers with mixed recent comments from “Great Business man” to “Stay away.”

Positive Feedback

Some users praise Ryan Cunningham’s vision and innovative ideas and call him a strong businessman.

Negative Feedback / Risk Areas

  • Recurring Cunningham Energy customer complaints about poor customer service and reliability.
  • Allegations of nonpayment on returns and concerns over billing and refunds.
  • Mention of lawsuits and claims of investment losses and being scammed.

Key Takeaways for Future Customers

  • Read Cunningham Energy reviews before investing and verify legal standing.
  • Confirm billing, refund, membership, or auto-ship terms and document communications.
  • Consider high price level and potential reliability risks when deciding to engage.
View full overview ›

Turn one complaint into a collective action

PC collective complaint

A Collective Complaint helps you unite consumers dealing with the same issue, such as wrong charges, unexpected fees, damaged items, or misleading promises. It goes beyond a single review by growing stronger with every signature, making it harder to ignore. Once you reach 20 supporters, we’ll send it to the company to encourage a response.

Start Collective Complaint
Show reviews that mention
businessman business ability ideas future vision impressive businessman ryan cunninghams cunninghams ability innovative ideas
Filter review
Anonymous
map-marker New York, New York

Very impressive businessman

I have been very impressed with Ryan Cunningham's ability to run his business with innovative ideas and a clear vision for the future. I'm expecting big things from him going forward.

User's recommendation: Great Business man

View full review
Anonymous
map-marker Fairview, Tennessee

Very poor return on investment

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full

Lots of promises up front but diminishing returns ever since and we haven't received a check since January of 2020. We feel like we have been scammed.

User's recommendation: I would recommend against investing, we wish we had not.

View full review
2 comments
Shawndell Thg

What exactly happened?

Nakea Jpp
reply icon Replying to comment of Shawndell Thg

HAVE HAD OVER $300,000 SITTING WITH CUNNINGHAM FOR OVER 4 YEARS WITH NO DRILLING ACTIVITY. PRIOR HAD $150,000 WITHOUT GOOD RESULTS BUT AT LEAST THERE WERE WELLLS DRILLED.

FINALLY SPOKE WITH RYAN YESTERDAY. VERY DEPRESSING. NOTHING IS GETTING DOWN WITH UNDRILLED WELLS, ISSUES WITH THE STATE EPA ETC. THE SITUATION HAS NOT IMPROVED IN 23 AND DOES NOT SOUND LIKE IT WILL MOVE FORWARD IN 24.

THINK WE NEED TO GET THE INVESTORS TOGETHER TO DETERMINE OPTIONS. BRIAN LANDRY bflandry86@***.com

View more comments (1)
Michael S Uib

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Cunningham has not performed in good faith.

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
AI Highlights
  • - -Monies were taken and promises not fulfilled.
  • - -Not a Covid issue; it shows non-performance.
  • - -Tens of thousands are involved; restitution is sought.

They have taken monies and not performed as stated.

This is not a Covid excusable issue, This is non performance and less than honorable business practices.

Need help in persuing restitution.

Tens of thousands of dollars involved.

Don't believe it started out as a Ponzi scheme but it sure feels like one now.

Loss:
$70

Preferred solution: Deliver product or service ordered

User's recommendation: Stay away

View full review
Leontine Ija

Invest In Oil And Gas Review

How many lawsuits against Cunningham energy

View full review
Michalina Pkv

Lawsuit against CLA client thrown out by judge

AI Highlights
  • - Judge Goodwin dismissed Neeley's case and ruled for the defendants.
  • - Colt Ledger claims Cunningham and Neeley face fraud and securities complaints.

Richard F. Neeley, Former Chief Justice of the WV Supreme Court Proves to be Legally Inept, Incompetent & Extremely Ignorant of WV Law

In a recent legal decision, United States District Court Judge, Joseph R. Goodwin took former Chief Justice Richard F. Neeley to Law School so to speak. Judge Goodwin, in his final decision, appeared to infer, on numerous occasions, that Mr. Neeley was substituting his own personal opinion as well as a very faulty interpretation for the actual law. Judge Goodwin dramatically struck down any and all arguments made by the apparently ignorant Mr. Neeley. After the spanking Mr. Neeley received regarding the above mentioned case, one must wonder exactly what classes Neeley actually attended at Yale University.

It appears that Mr. Neeley has basically created not to mention filed a baseless lawsuit. He then attempted to defend a position that was entirely frivolous from inception and apparently entirely void of any acceptable legal knowledge and/or basis. One can only surmise that actions such as these were possibly devised for the sole purpose of “milking” billing hours from Mr. Neeley’s extremely wealthy client, Ryan E. M. Cunningham, President of Cunningham Energy, LLC. However, this line of thought could possibly lead someone to thinking that Neeley was conducting himself in an unethical manner. Yet Judge Goodwin never accused Mr. Neeley of such an infraction.

Mr. Ryan E. M. Cunningham and Cunningham Energy, LLC, are currently under investigation by Colt Ledger & Associates, Inc. the nation’s premier private investigation firm specializing in State and Federal Securities and Criminal Fraud. CLA is investigating Cunningham for alleged Elder Financial Fraud, Money Laundering, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, etc., etc., etc.

Colt Ledger released the following statement, “It is my opinion, based on known facts which are at my disposal, that this lawsuit was the brainchild of Richard F. Neeley and his client, Ryan Cunningham as an attempt to threaten and intimidate a very dissatisfied Cunningham client. This seems to be an attempt to keep said client from expressing his total and complete dissatisfaction with Mr. Cunningham’s business practices.”

“Unfortunately, it is apparent that Mr. Cunningham placed entirely too much trust in his “legal monkey”. And the decision made by Mr. Cunningham to attack his own client has essentially backfired on Cunningham with the embarrassing performance displayed by Mr. Neeley. Now they must face the filing of a massive number of State and Federal Securities along with Criminal Fraud complaints by Colt Ledger & Associates, Inc., against Ryan E.M. Cunningham and Cunningham Energy, LLC.

When inquired about Mr. Neeley’s court performance, Colt Ledger, owner of Colt Ledger & Associates, Inc. said, “If Neeley is the finest legal representation the Cunningham fortune can buy and the authorities decide to move on the alleged victim’s complaints, My only thought is I hope Mr. Cunningham likes orange.”

Mr. Neeley’s destruction and demise at the hands of Judge Goodwin was utterly complete. This was clearly demonstrated by the court’s Conclusion, “For the reasons discussed above, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Docket 3] is GRANTED. The court ORDERS that judgment be entered in favor of the defendants and that this case be dismissed and stricken from the docket of this court.” If you care to read Judge Goodwin’s decision visit coltledger.com for the complete ruling.

Mr. Ledger noted, “We have had interactions with attorneys such as Mr. Neeley on a couple of occasions. These types of attorneys are likely the reason there are so many lawyer jokes. However, Neeley, personally has proven himself to be extremely competent as well as ept at lying and distorting the truth. The fact that he has proven himself to be utterly useless regarding matters dealing with the law cannot be, in my opinion, surprising to anyone who knows him. I, personally, am extremely happy that Mr. Neeley is on the other side of the table representing Cunningham. Due to this the future of the alleged victims of Ryan Cunningham appears to be even brighter.”

Mr. Ledger did raise some personal concerns regarding the people of West Virginia, “However, in spite of Mr. Neeley’s laughable performance in court, I think that there is a much more significant not to mention potentially damaging consequences for the people of West Virginia with regard to Neeley.”

“Richard F. Neeley is a retired Chief Justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court! Consider the implications of that fact when reviewing Judge Goodwin’s decision. A Chief Justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court who appears completely ignorant of West Virginia law and its application! Neeley is apparently, from what I interpret from Judge Goodwin’s decision, a person prone to whimsical interpretations of the law without rhyme, reason or legal basis. Mr. Neeley appears to be making legal decisions based on nothing more substantial than a faulty thought process. I would think that the people of West Virginia are pleased and relieved that Mr. Neeley is gone. The next question that arises is how damage has Mr. Neeley perpetrated against the citizens of West Virginia?”

“If I was a resident of West Virginia and if Mr. Neeley was involved in any legal opinion or decision, as the Chief Justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court that went beyond what he put in his morning coffee, I, personally, would be immediately requesting a sweeping investigation into his tenure.”

In closing our interview, Colt Ledger stated, “Of course, all of my comments, herein, are simply my personal opinion. We will allow the proper authorities to decide if Mr. Cunningham should face any consequences for his alleged activities. However, always remember the fact that everyone is innocent until proven otherwise.”

View full review
1 comment
Guest

this issue was 2014. not applicable to resolving current issue loss greater than70,000 not 70

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content
  • PissedConsumer is on the Inc. 5000 list

For more information read Blog article