Craig S Mvx

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
| map-marker The Bronx, New York

The concealment of police misconducts.

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
Bridgeport Police Department - The concealment of police misconducts.
Bridgeport Police Department - The concealment of police misconducts. - Image 2
Updated by user Feb 11, 2024

After the court's investigation and more than three years of bias, the judge eventually scheduled a trial for me after three and half years of pre-judice and numerous pre-trial hearings in which the prosecution railroaded me. In any case, the defense and child advocate...

Original review Feb 11, 2024
Victims' entitlement to a suitable reaction to their needs
The significance of conducting an investigation is demonstrated by this case. Do not allow this to happen to you.

(When cops lie, the innocent pay.)
This is the reality. The Bridgeport Police Department has been under investigation for corruption for several years. "There have been several investigations into the Bridgeport Police Department for corruption. An internal investigation found that 17 Bridgeport police officers were facing discipline, nine could be fired after the city's Office of Internal Affairs found they lied on official reports." Consider the facts below:
After being wrongfully charged, set up, and framed by Officer Detective Jeffrey Holtz, badge number 40462, and law enforcement.
Before and after court, I've made several complaints with the Bridgeport Police Department's Internal Affairs.
Now, more than three and a half years after my compliance with them, they are still attempting to exploit my disability as a justification for the cops' lies and refusing to investigate Holtz's perjury and accept the reality that he lied.
Below, my conversation with Lt.

Adam Rozum of the Bridgeport Police Internal Affairs speaks for itself.
No disrespect intended because of my disability; I wrote our conversation on 9/1 down, so our conversation is clearer.
Please read this in full because it's as clear as it's going to get.
1. You talk about a judge signing off on the warrant for my arrest. And I say it was because of the lies and malicious intent told by Bridgeport Police Department Detective Jeffrey Holtz. Case in point: see below.
After an examination of Detective Holtz's evidence to the court, GA 2, and three ½ years of pre-justice, the judge finally fixed a trial date for me after nearly four years of prejudice and multiple pre-trial hearings in which the prosecution railroaded me.

In any case, the defense and child advocacy groups were given the first opportunity to speak. It's hardly surprising that the child advocate was unable to find the purported victim or witnesses. This case was likewise a nolle. (Ruled and signed by a Superior Court Judge.)
The Court My team's investigation was and is done.

Bridgeport Police internal may be ongoing only because the Bridgeport Police Department and its team chose to ignore it.
My first complaint was ignored. I had no idea what was going on. I just knew it was nonsense.
Interview with John K, second complaint: I had a better idea. It was obviously a framing.
On my next meeting with Bridgeport PD internally, because I was asked by John K in the meeting to let him know what happened after court and in the interview with the new internal investigator, I did.

I was framed.
Focus your attention on Jeffrey Holtz's evidence. And not a bogus story. Just concentrate on the police perjury.
Both recordings and the car were found to be false. And I've given Bridgeport Police internal documentation on that, including a photo of the car and two recordings.

Jeffrey Holtz has been accused of setting up and framing a man, Craig Sears, as well as forging and falsifying documents. And lying in official reports.
Pay attention to the dates and years. The reported nonsense is alleged to have happened on November 8th, 9th, and 10th 2019 on Catherine Street according to the warrant for my arrest and its reports. An investigation was conducted into my case, revealing that the car he used to frame me was not my car.

The JPG file created and modified on December 19, 2019, did not match the victim's description of the suspect. The recordings were also altered, with the WAV file in Ramos' interview on Catherine Street, allegedly recorded on December 21st, 2020, being modified on July 3rd, 2017.
"And 20 minutes into the alleged recording on December 21st, you will hear Jeffrey Holtz telling the alleged witness and victim that the police obtained my license plate on December 20th, 2019, on the east side. Contradicting the arrest warrant and all its reports."
As for this invented scenario, call from Camile D: The MP3 file was created at 12:01 p.m. on January 14, 2020.
It should be noted that you will hear things said differently if you listen to the recordings in different applications and with different computer software, since Jeffrey Holtz tells them what to say.

Having been modified so that it can be used for a different purpose as a reference, etc.
Craig Sears case highlights the importance of conducting an investigation and regarding the recordings,
Obtain modified and produced dates by examining document attributes and running them through a software tool to detect audio and video tampering.
It's not rocket science. Two voiceovers reveal altered recordings and a generic stock photo of a Ford Mustang GT, which detective Holtz claimed was my vehicle. Along with a fictional story, an alleged victim and witnesses, it was not my car. This implies evidence tampering, where Holtz created evidence, implicated me, accused me, and falsely arrested me.

It was setup by a frame-up.
That falls under 18 U.S. Code § 1038: False information and hoaxes:
Detective Holtz's fabrications of evidence and false accusations are not only damaging to the integrity of the investigation, but also raise serious concerns about the fairness and legitimacy of the entire legal process in general. It is clear that this setup was carefully designed to manipulate the facts and target me unjustly.
This incident is an example of how police officers manipulate facts and evidence to unjustly target an individual. It is essential to ensure that police officers are held accountable for their actions.
In simple terms, despite providing the court and police internal affairs with solid evidence, including recordings, documentation, and fraudulent reports, my requests for an investigation into police perjury were denied.

This refusal to address the issue can be described as an attempt to hide or cover up their misconduct. Click on the link further below.
Penal Code 118.1 makes it illegal for police officers to file a false report. Not to mention all the additional civil rights abuses.
Too many to list.
"Case in point" Is it possible to prove a sound file has been edited?
Yes, if you're the police, and it's important enough to you.
Forensic specialists are able to use variations in the AC supply that are common and logged across the entire electrical network. This is called electrical network frequency (ENF) analysis.

This applies even to audio recorded under studio conditions.
Begging the question of How often have the same insults been directed at others, and how often has detective Jeffrey Holtz 40462 of the Bridgeport, CT, police department accused the weak and disabled of wrongfully using the same witnesses?
To sum up, how many people has he wrongly convicted or falsely implicated by the Bridgeport Police Department and its Detective Bureau.?
Going back to the Bridgeport Police Internal. When the meeting was ended, they were unhappy because I had audio recorded it.
My name, my disability, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and, in my case, my right to record.
In the state of Connecticut, can you record an in person? Conversation.
Connecticut requires at least one party's consent to record an in-person conversation.

For telephonic conversations, the consent of all parties is required to avoid potential civil liability, though criminal penalties do not apply if at least one party has consented to the recording. Craig Sears consented to the in-person meeting with the Bridgeport Police Department's internal being recorded, but not the phone call.
View full review

User's recommendation: I would suggest anyone out there who has a criminal or civil case involving the Bridgeport Police Department, and especially Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462, who is involved in your case, hire a competent and private attorney to look into your case. If you or your loved one has already been convicted, and these officers are involved in the case, I would file an appeal and have it reopened. Don't let this happen to you.

Craig S Cbs

This review is written by an individual who has purchased the reviewed product/service and/or confirms being a paying customer of this company. Check our FAQ

Verified Buyer
| map-marker Bridgeport, Connecticut

Discrimination against people with impairments in law enforcement.

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
Bridgeport Police Department - Discrimination against people with impairments in law enforcement.
Bridgeport Police Department - Discrimination against people with impairments in law... - Image 2
It's been over 30 years since my injury, and there is not a day that goes by where I'm not haunted by my past experiences and wake up from a nightmare, yelling and screaming. After being set up and framed by Detective Jeffrey Holtz of the Bridgeport Police Department, an investigation was initiated after a misrepresented car and a fictional story were discovered. After proving it in court, I filed the necessary paperwork to file a citizen's complaint. Three years and 10 months after the fact, I got a response to my citizen's complaint from Bridgeport Police Internal Affairs. Of Unfounded, as well as reviewing the documents. It appears that it's a policy for the Bridgeport Police Department to frame and set up people with fraudulent evidence. I will never give up after multiple attempts at trying to get justice for myself. And getting nothing but BS from police internal affairs, As you see below, I put in another request for the second step meeting with the Police Commissioners Board. To JB At the request of CM said, thank you for your email. I'm no longer with the City of Bridgeport. Please email j@ for all matters. 1.I am requesting a meeting with the Police Commissioner's Board. I got a response to my citizen's complaint from the Bridgeport office of the Office of Police Internal Affairs, as well as reviewing the documents. Furthermore, I do not agree with the findings, and neither did the court. 2.Keep in mind that the cops and Detective Holtz never questioned me about this case; I wasn't seen at the alleged crime. I was never chosen out of a photo lineup, etc., and I don't match the description of the suspect given by the alleged victim in the police report. 3.Along with the fact that I/we were not in Bridgeport, CT, on November 8th and have documented proof of it, it appears that it's a policy for the Bridgeport Police Department to fabricate false evidence. 1.My citizen complaint date is 3-6. File number 230001**** was completely ignored. Penal Code 118.1 makes it illegal for police officers to file a false report. Not to mention all the additional civil rights abuses. After being set up and framed by Detective Jeffrey Holt of the Bridgeport Police Department, an investigation was initiated after a misrepresented car and a fictional story were discovered. When Holtz looked up my name and disability online, as mentioned and demonstrated in the police record, he saw an opportunity to be prejudiced against me. I'll put money into it. The moment Holtz learned I had a disability, everything became one-sided. You have two voiceovers over old, altered recordings, and in lieu of evidence, an internet search yielded a generic stock photo of a car that Holtz reported to be my vehicle. Along with an alleged victim witness and a fictional story. This implies "evidence tampering," or, in other words, that Detective Jeffrey Holtz created false evidence, implicated me, falsely accused me, and then had me falsely arrested. And we're supposed to put our trust in them? This was obviously a setup by framing. Testilying It is clear that the setup is a setup. Clearly, Detective Holtz lied on legal documents and lied to a Superior Court judge in order to get a bench warrant for my arrest. That falls under 18 U.S. Code § 1038: False information and hoaxes: Clearly. Perjury qualifies as a crime against justice. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prevents governmental institutions from discriminating against people with disabilities, including police agencies. When it comes to police prejudice, who will speak up for me? I have no one to turn to but another cop in law enforcement. And all that will get me is more nonsense. Case in point: the Office of Internal Affairs is run by cops, and as referenced above, I spent almost four years proving it. And the corrupt criminal justice system is very much aware of it. It looks like job security. I can't help but be concerned about what the state is going to do to me next, all because I have a traumatic brain injury. Even with the case being a nolle It doesn't change the fact that the police perjury misconduct and definition have had a detrimental effect on my reputation, my ability to receive aid with disability care, and my capacity to work again. Even though I'm happy that my alleged case was dismissed, How can you put your trust in a system that would rather lock you up and throw away the key, and do it by using abuse of power? It's been over three and a half years, and I've lost so much. To understand character defamation in the disability industry, you must first experience it. The system is connected, but it's disconnected. I will never be able to reclaim what was taken from me. My life was deliberately wrecked by Jeffrey Holtz. With his deliberate dishonesty, deceit, and criminal conduct, given my engagement in local and national efforts for all brain injury survivors, my name will never be the same in local and national government as a result of Jeffrey Holtz's criminal behavior and what he did. Begging the question of How often have the same insults been directed at others, and how often has detective Holtz accused the weak and disabled of wrongfully using the same witnesses? To sum up, how many people has he wrongly convicted or falsely implicated? GA 2 should investigate each of Jeffrey Holtz's cases to determine how many innocent and disabled people he has imprisoned or hospitalized over the years, and then take the necessary legal measures to correct it and make that difference in somebody else's life and the lives of their families. Although I have a lot of respect for the police, I don't respect corrupt, dishonest brady cops that lie about us, use fabricated evidence to set up and frame the week, and are disabled for alleged crimes that they didn't commit. Detective Jeffrey Holtz is unmistakably the type of officer who harms the reputation of law enforcement. Fortunately, I am a strong advocate for myself, and with an investigation, good counsel, a voice, a lot of persistence, and proving the fact that Holtz lied, the court case was dismissed. Even with the case being a nolle It doesn't change the fact that the police perjury misconduct and definition have had a detrimental effect on my reputation, my ability to receive aid with disability care, and my capacity to work. To understand character defamation in the disability industry, you must first experience it. They say the systems are connected, but they're disconnected. If you know what I'm saying, I will never be able to reclaim what was taken from me.
View full review
Pros:
  • No pros
Cons:
  • Police perjury misconduct and definition

Preferred solution: Respect for police is a virtue, but they should not tolerate corrupt, dishonest officers who lie,

User's recommendation: Respect for police is a virtue, but they should not tolerate corrupt, dishonest officers who lie.

Anonymous

Police officers were rude

The police officers started to yell and came off hostage. They need to stop being aggressive when they are being showed respect. Also was ask why I stopped at a red night. Thought it was a law, guess the officer doesn't know that.
View full review
Reason of review:
Poor customer service
1 comment
Richard R Pvd

I would suggest anyone out there who has a criminal or civil case involving the Bridgeport Police Department, and especially if these officers are involved in your case, I would hire a competent and private attorney to look into your case. If you or your love one has already been convicted and these officers are involved in the case, I would file an appeal and have it re-opened.

Anonymous
map-marker Bridgeport, Connecticut

Review in Government and Politics category from Bridgeport, Connecticut

Hi, my name is Lorie and I am a personal friend of Mark, stop bashing him, he upholds the law to the fullest and would never approach anyone without just cause, not his style. I would personally defend him to the max. I for one beleive without a dought that if he approached this individual there had to be a reason,are you in a drug infested area, high crime area, near a school, hanging around for long periods of time? To sum it up there is something you,are doing to make him approach you, what about your criminal record stop playing the victim roll.
View full review
Juana Htl

Police misconduct

Bridgeport Police Department - Police misconduct
Bridgeport Police Department - Police misconduct  - Image 2
Bridgeport Police Department - Police misconduct  - Image 3

Office of the Board of Police Commissioners.

Third floor of Police Headquarters, 300 Congress Street Bridgeport, Connecticut.

Re: Second Step Barros Hearing.

first I would like to say thank you for having me here today For the second step of my complete against Bridgeport police K9 officer Mark Martocchio. I would also like to add that if I slur my words when I'm talking this is just the way I am, I have a disability, this is why I'm choosing to read my testimony to you today.

The first time that I was pulled over by Bridgeport police officer Mark Martocchio my car was on the side of the road I was talking to someone that I knew as I explained to him that's when he pulled me and that person over and started talking to us individually, this is when I explained to him my situation with work and my disability after that he searched my car and told me to go on my way....

The second time officer Martocchio pulled me over he started calling me names an went as far as calling me ***, after that officer Martocchio pulled the keys out of the ignition of my car I felt threatened by this so I grabbed my cell phone and I attempted to call the Bridgeport police department to get a Lieutenant to come to the scene, that's when officer Mark Martocchio grab my cell phone out of my hands and threw it on top of my car and began to threaten me saying things like he is going to have my car towed if I keep coming to Bridgeport, then he searched me and my car without my permission or a valid reason then wrote me a complaint ticket....

A short while after that I started getting pulled over by other Bridgeport police officers threatening me while throwing me up against a fence telling me to stay out of Bridgeport, I even attempted to make a call to the police department when this was happening to me to make a complaint and had my cell phone ripped out of my hands, then one day, I even had a police officer in the town I live in, come to my apt saying that they received a call from the Bridgeport police department, Saying if I keep calling some girl in Bridgeport that they are going to put a warrant out for my arrest. That's when I began looking into what was going on and why this was happening to me, but I received no answers! That goes without saying It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out with whom and where it started...

The third time that I was pulled over by officer Martocchio I came out of a store and got in my car and as I was turning my car around to go back towards the main road officer Martocchio came up behind me and blocked me in, he got out of his car and came over to me and started asking me why are you here in Bridgeport. Isn't this a free country....

The fourth time that officer Martocchio pulled me over I was pulling into a gas station and Officer Martocchio pulled up behind me and ordered me to pull over into the back of the gas station he got out of his car came over to me and asked me for my driver's license and I gave it to him then he began to harass & threaten me when I asked him why he pulled me over he said that I was not wearing a seatbelt it was clear I was wearing a seatbelt and I kept repeating it he side tell it to the court, (threatening me, do you see the pattern here.) Within about 4 to 5 minutes another police officer came to the gas station and officer Martocchio went over to his car, I can see them talking to each other after about 1 minute officer Martocchio comes back over to my car throws my driver's license at me hitting me in the face with it then he backed off and only then I was able to leave. This was the first time and the last time that any other officer came to the scene where officer Martocchio was harassing or threatening me. (like he did every other time he pulled me over)

I'm tired of being harassed by the Bridgeport police.

On 3/19/15 was the 5th time that I was pulled over by officer Mark Martocchio.

Every time officer Martocchio pulls me over he has some sort of smart remark, like he did on 3/19/15 when he saw my car on the opposite side of the road from where he was driving officer Martocchio made a U-turn and came up behind my car. He was driving very fast and then turned on his lights and pulled me over and said, "You wanted to come down here (Bridgeport) so what are you doing here? I told him the truth and then he said, "you're not very smart are you" when I asked him why he pulled me over he said that I was not wearing a seatbelt. I was clearly wearing a seatbelt and I even tried explaining that if I was not wearing a seatbelt that the car alarm would go off repeatedly, but he wrote the "complaint ticket anyways. Having a disability and being called not smart - *** on more than one occasion by officer Martocchio is unexcitable. Example that's like a white person walking up to a collard person and using the N word not only is that racist but that's also discrimination! I feel the same way when officer Martocchio called me *** and another occasion not smart, not only do I feel threatened but I also feel very much discriminated against.

I don't know what his problem is or why he has it out for me or if this is just the kind of person he is. What I do know is now I have to feel threatened because of my disability as I explained to internal affairs I am a very well known documented national advocate for people with disabilities I go to meetings in Bridgeport my doctor's office are in Bridgeport. I used to live in Bridgeport for 27 years (I know a lot of people there) and various state and government offices that I have to go to for work/disability programs are in Bridgeport.

Police harassment is an abuse of an officer’s authority by continually stopping someone, aggressively questioning him or her, or by conducting an unwarranted or illegal search and seizure.

I feel like Officer Mark Martocchio goes out of his way to pull me over in every single different location. The things he has pulled me over for honestly have no purpose. "Not having my seat belt on" when it was on in clear sight! Really? I can't drive 2 seconds down the road without my seatbelt on because the bell rings constant, and it drives me up a wall. Plus I have a disability so the first thing I'm going to do when I get into a car is be safe and put my seatbelt on regardless. Police today use their badge as a symbol of power and this is why are society is the way it is. Instead of worries about the major issues, cops like officer Mark Martocchio are worried about why I'm in Bridgeport. Personal it is none of anyone's business why I'm in Bridgeport, especially because I'm not doing nothing wrong. Like I have stated before I come up here for a lot of reasons and one is work. And now when I do come to this town I have to worry about if I'm going to be pulled over and accused of "not wearing a seat belt" or "for being in the middle of the road while waiting for traffic to clear, not only that but know I have to worry about having a profile put on me because some officer wants to justify his actions to try and make a name for himself at my expense.

Fact: It's been several months and I'm still being harassed by the Bridgeport police department because of officer Mark Martocchio, about 1 ½ months ago I came out of my doctor's office off of east main street in Bpt as I was driving going towards route 8 a Bridgeport police officer pulled up behind my car as I was stopped at a traffic light, I can see him in my rearview mirror looking down typing on the keyboard of the computer in his car the next thing I know I saw the lights of his car turned on asking me to pull over, then that officer and a another officer got out of the car and started questioning me why are you here in Bridgeport.

View full review
Reason of review:
Poor customer service
5 comments
Craig S Mvx

This is my own first-hand account of dealing with police corruption. Through investigation On March 1, 2023, three years after the fact, the case was thrown out.

I'm writing this in the hopes that it will stop someone else from experiencing this kind of police misconduct. "How did the girl get your license plate number?" I've been asked since the beginning. My standard response has always been that she didn't. The cops did what the cops did during a bogus traffic stop on December 20th, 2019, at 11 a.m.

on the opposite side of town from where the incident occurred and miles away from her alleged school. and put my license plate number in the wrong place. Keep in mind the dates, years, and times of these fictitious allegations. For example, I received the call a few days after the 20th of December and had no idea why.

I requested that an attorney be present during questioning and was denied. The next thing I knew, in January of 2020, I found out there was a warrant out for my arrest, and to my surprise, it was for stalking in the third, so I turned myself in and went to court. When I appeared in court, the prosecution upgraded the charge to first-degree stalking and added the charge of risk of injury to a child because I had been denied that right. As you will see throughout, it was a set-up.

According to the warrant for my arrest and its fictitious and false libel statements made by detective Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462 of the Bridgeport, CT, police department, on November 8th, 2019, sometime between 3:00 and 4:00 PM, someone said "excuse me or Yo" to some girl and was ignored; if anything was said at all, who knows, I was not there! and witnesses that can attest to it. Why was it made into a fictional story? Your guess is as good as mine.

It must be a common routine for them, for the sake of job security. For the past few years, the Bridgeport Police Department has been under scrutiny for corruption within the department. •"If they had my license plate number before December 20th, 2019, they wouldn't have waited over a month to talk to someone or do something about it." Is it surprising that, in one of his reports, it does state It should be noted that after an Internet search of the suspect, Sears found that he was a victim of a traumatic brain injury when he was 21 years old. He didn't even get that right.

However, it goes without saying that by doing an internet search on my name, it clearly made him aware that I’m a very well documented brain injury survivor. with that said You have to live it to know it; having an unrecognized disability shows that Jeffrey Holtz sought to use my condition to justify his perjury and blame it on me. For instance. The court tried to justify it for more than two and a half years by utilizing a 54-56 program.

For me, there is absolutely no chance that I would accept any kind of plea agreement for something I had absolutely nothing to do with after repeatedly asking for an investigation into my case and being completely disregarded. In addition to having my console on file, I have never been questioned about this case in over two and a half years. By the police or the court of law, I filed a motion to appear in my case, giving me the right to all of the state's discovery (evidence), including photographs, audio, written statements, physical evidence, and so on. I was also given the right to write letters and motions in my case.

That being said, they can make it appear any way they want in the bench warrant for my arrest and its reports by twisting it, but it's not going to change the facts. 1.The automobile was not mine. 2.and I don't match the victim's description of the suspect. 3.I have documentation of my whereabouts on the days they claim I was in the area, as well as documented proof that while I was in Bridgeport, I was there for a cause.

4.I have evidence that Jeffrey Holtz set me up as well as evidence that he forged and falsified documents. A good example, according to the Ford Mustang GT photo type of file: The JPG File (.jpg) was created and last modified on December 19, 2019. With that said, here's the link to the photo of the car that was reported to be mine. Click on the link: http://***/colors/car/57440***-*.html What do you call it when it's a set-up in comparison to what was allegedly my car?

Along with voiceovers over modified recordings. For example. Take 1.Camile D's phone call: The MP3 file was created on January 14, 2020, at 12:01 p.m. 2.The WAV file in Ramos' interview on Catherine Street was apparently modified on March 7, 2017, at 10:03 a.m.

Keep in mind that the recordings themselves could be older. Case in point. I should add that if you listen to the recordings using different computer software and in different applications, you'll hear things said differently, with Jeffrey Holtz telling them what to say, indicating that they've been modified. Modified-adjective A modified, etc., has had changes made to it so it can be used for a different purpose as a reference.

Begging the question How often have the same insults been directed at others, and how often has Jeffrey Holtz accused the weak and disabled of wrongfully using the same witnesses?" As evidenced by the warrant for my arrest, etc., Penal Code 118.1 makes it illegal for police officers to file a false report. Not to mention all the additional civil rights abuses. Although I'm relieved that my case was dismissed, it doesn't change the reality that this police defamation has negatively impacted my reputation, my ability to receive disability care assistance, and my capacity to work. When will disability prejudice be a thing of the past?

I would suggest anyone out there who has a criminal or civil case involving the Bridgeport Police Department, and especially Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462, is involved in your case, hire a competent and private attorney to look into your case.

If you or your loved one has already been convicted and these officers are involved in the case, I would file an appeal and have it reopened. And I strongly urge Bridgeport CT police internal affairs and Bridgeport Superior Court at 172 Golden Hill Street in Bridgeport, Connecticut.GA 2 to research each of Jeffrey Holtz's cases to see how many innocent and disabled individuals he has imprisoned or hospitalized over the years and to take the required legal actions to fix it and make that difference in somebody else's life and the lives of their families.

Richard R Pvd

I know what you're saying. Put yourself in my shoes I do not know who the *** they're talking about.

The fact is before and after I turn myself in at the police station, I was in the dark. I knew nothing about this BS. I had no questions answered. I only know what I know about this case by picking up the report (s) from the court!

And then picking up its fictitious reports at the police station, I was never at this girl's house or school etc. I've never been questioned about this case not by the police or the court as far as I know they pick my name out of a Hat. Easily verified look at the day, date and time that I'd turn myself in and then look at when my disability staff bonded me out, keeping in mind that the courthouse is maybe 5 or 10 minutes around the block from the police station with that said ask the court Ga2 located at 172 Golden Hill Street Bridgeport Connecticut for a copy of the security footage for that day and time and I will guarantee on it you will see me and my staff picking up the warrant for my arrest, not to mention I had to sign my name and show identification of who I was in order to pick it up - which also backs up everything else I've said; about these lying Brady cops falsifying records and lying to superior court judges; they can even get the video footage from the police station it will say the same thing I'm saying. I don't know why I'm even bothered with this nonsense.

I wasn't even there. I am Not guilty. The allegations that were placed on me are false. I don't know who it is and I know for a fact it wasn't me.

I have proof of my whereabouts on the days that they're allegedly saying I was in the area; and then I have documented proof showing that when I was in Bridgeport, I was there for a reason. I've said this before and I will continue to say it, I know for a fact that this was not me and these allegations don't even make any sense, just look at the allegation that they say that the person had facial hair. Not a day in my life have I ever had facial hair and I have pictures and documentation to prove that. I am well documented with the state for my advocacy work.

And to have these false charges put against me is completely outrageous. Case and point - I wrote over 50 emails to my attorney, I wrote letters to the judge in the court, fax, emails and in verbal words my Dr. and even their own doctors are saying the same things and we had meetings with them being some of my eyewitnesses who there also saying the same things I'm saying and it’s not being heard and that’s on top of giving them everything including State and Gov paperwork and doctor's notes and there still pushing it off on a Sec. 54/56 you might as well call it a Sec.

54-56d. same concept. idea, belief, opinion, view, impression - No matter what you call it’s the same.

let's use his disability as our crutch to cover up the police perjury What would you do in my position - especially when the court and the attorneys that are supposed to be your voice are pushing it off on being cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs when I'm not and I back of what I say? Craig

Guest
reply icon Replying to comment of Richard R Pvd

Keep the faith. *** police really should be turned in by their own. They just embarrass the department and all the real heroes.

Guest
reply icon Replying to comment of Richard R Pvd

Being wrongfully accused due to disability prejudice Your Honor, I'm pleading with you to put an end to this, it’s been over three years, and it's taking its toll on me, my documented disability care services, and my job as a disability advocate for children and young adults. For example, supported employment and what the court reported to the media about this case have both been extremely damaging to me and my work.

I'm not attempting to promote myself but rather put an end to this. You have to live it to know it and understand it. The court has put my disability and its services on trial in a big way, and I feel threatened as a result. "How did the girl get your license plate number?" I've been asked since the beginning.

My standard response has always been that she didn't. The cops did what the cops did during a bogus traffic stop on December 20th, at 11 a.m. on the opposite side of town from where the incident occurred and miles away from her alleged school. and put my license plate number in the wrong place.

According to the paperwork that Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462, of the Bridgeport, CT, police department filed with the court that I received from the court, that is not her school district and not her home address, as referenced below. Because I am not an attorney, my attorney can handle it. As a result, I filed a motion to suppress the evidence. September 6th.

Below Take into account the dates and times. That being said, they can make it appear any way they want in the bench warrant for my arrest and its reports by twisting it, but it's not going to change the facts. 1.Alleged photo of the suspects’ car My car, contrary to what Jeffrey Holtz of the Bridgeport, CT, police department claimed, was not a Ford Mustang GT convertible like the one in the picture. But Jeffrey Holtz forged records to tell a judge that the car was mine even though it wasn't, using Photoshop to alter a picture of a Ford Mustang GT convertible that he downloaded from the internet that had no one inside and no license plate number visible.

2.example according to the Ford Mustang GT photo type of file: The JPG File (.jpg) was created and last modified on December 19, 2019. 3.With that said, here's the link to the photo of the car that was reported to be mine. Click on the link: http://***/colors/car/57440***-*.html What do you call it when it's a set-up in comparison to what was allegedly my car? 4.Camile Dejesus phone call, The MP3 file was created on January 14, 2020, at 12:01 p.m.

5.The WAV file in Ramos' interview on Catherine Street was apparently modified on March 7, 2017 at 10:03 a.m. Keep in mind that the recordings themselves could be older. according to the recording (Ramos interview on Catherine Street) Jeffrey Holtz is heard 20 minutes into the recording telling the alleged witnesses and alleged victim that they (the police) were the ones who got the license plate number of my car on December 20th, which contradicts the warrant for my arrest and reports everything regardless of the dates and times, and it clearly demonstrates that everything I've mentioned in my motions, letters, and spoken statements is correct. Penal Code 118.1 makes it illegal for police officers to file a false report.

I have provided solid and obvious proof. I've established my innocence and supported it with facts and eyewitness testimony; I'm requesting that my case be nolle dismissed or transferred to a different court. I am not being treated fairly. For example, on January 11th.

three years after the fact, the reason offered to me and my disability staff for another extension until February 8th, was that they were now changing the dates of the documented occurrences and when they claimed these incidents occurred. When I've previously demonstrated that they're false. I stand by my "Motion to Suppress Evidence" dated September 6, and all its additional information and facts. I will include According to the incident report for December 20, an alleged bolo came out of a suspect's car on December 19th.

The car in the photo was not mine, and it is also in my motion to suppress evidence. the police in the records and the description, everything goes all over the place. For instance, in the warrant for my arrest, the suspect was described as having facial hair, whereas I didn't have any. That being said, they can make it appear any way they want in the bench warrant for my arrest and its reports by twisting it, but it's not going to change the facts.

as an example. "On November 8, on Ramos Catherine Street, someone allegedly said, "excuse me" or "yo" and was ignored, according to the bench warrant for my arrest and its alleged accusations," it says in the warrant. • for example. "On Ramos Catherine Street, the audio recording doesn’t say anything about what happened." It simply describes a guess based on hearsay, according to the recording, in its comments, no matter what it may be (reference below the investigation) on December 21.

• as an illustration: It wasn't in the alleged victim statements or the recording, but it was used as a justification in the warrant for my arrest, along with "Did you ever beep your horn at a woman?" which wasn't in the report or the recording; no one ever said anyone beeped at them, but it was used as a justification in the warrant for my arrest. The case against me, as well as a Photoshop image of a car that wasn't mine and the fact that the victim identified the suspect as having facial hair while I didn't, has never been called into question in over three years. Neither has the fact that I was never given a Miranda warning. Fact: Also, according to the bench warrant for my arrest and the police incident report, it looked like a Ford Mustang allegedly matching the description of my car was harassing schoolgirls at dismissal time.

Look at the facts. I was pulled over on the east side, nowhere near this girl, on December 20th, for allegedly running a traffic light at 11 a.m., and according to the police incident report for December 20th, a Ford. Mustang "harassed" schoolgirls at dismissal time, and the application for a warrant for my arrest was issued on December 27th, along with its reports on the same day. • "If they had my license plate number before December 20th, they wouldn't have waited over a month to talk to someone or do something about it." • For example, I received the call a few days after the 20th of December and had no idea why.

I requested that an attorney be present during questioning and was denied. The next thing I knew, in January I found out there was a warrant out for my arrest, and to my surprise, it was for stalking in the third, so I turned myself in and went to court. • When I appeared in court, the prosecution upgraded the charge to first-degree stalking and added the charge of risk of injury to a child because I had been denied that right. • And the prosecution has receipts from VIP Wash Lube on Main Street in Bridgeport proving why I was there on that day and time.

and, once again, they have an AutoZone receipt on north Ave for where I was going and went; I was never around this girl. "With that being said," I've already submitted my motion to suppress evidence on September 6, 2022, and I stand by everything I've said in it. and all of its additional information and facts.With that being said, the data in my case does not add up. Don't allow anyone to say I didn't say it.

• According to court filings, the date of birth of Iyonna Ramos is December 13, her home address is Catherine St., Bridgeport, CT; and her school is a basic high school. It doesn't add up. I'm requesting that the state's evidence against me be thoroughly reviewed, including both recordings and the vehicle photo. Complete file and folder change monitoring: who changed the file or folder name, when the changes were done, I stand by my motion to suppress evidence and all of its comments date September 6th, About me • Just as no two people are exactly alike, no two brain injuries are exactly alike.

When will disability prejudice be a thing of the past? I'm qualified to make these claims because I participated in the Connecticut acquired brain injury (ABI) class action lawsuit, which is how the state of Connecticut implemented the ABI waiver for individuals like me. These exact same biases and government ignorance served as the basis for the class-action lawsuit. The only difference is that back then they called it Connecticut General Statutes 54–56d, "Competency to Stand Trial," and put you in a psychological hospital, hence the class action lawsuit.

Click here: https://***/case/439/ I won't go much into this bias; instead, I'll just say a few things. Due to my advocacy work and involvement in both local and national movements for all brain injury survivors, I will say this: This case confirms what I have told every staff member at the US Senate, White House, and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, over the years, and it demonstrates how easy it is for states to exploit and discriminate against someone. like me.

At the end of the day, no matter how it's put, I cannot receive a fair trial in the jurisdiction where the matter is pending. • On January 11th, after three years of not being able to speak up for myself, not having been asked any questions about this case, etc. and being completely disregarded, I made it happen on 1-11, and it's now on record. Why do I need a program, etc.

for something I had nothing to do with? I am not guilty; I wasn't there. With all due respect What part of this do you not comprehend? That being said If you recall, honorable Judge McShane, your remarks in court on January 11, regarding a 54-56 case and point, what you said After I spoke, which proved my point with respect, I just don't see it that way.

Having a documented disability implied that you wanted to blame their perjury on me because of my condition and exploit it to cover it. up. See below. Case CR20-January 11th State of Connecticut v CS Honorable Judge If it may please the court my name is CS, I don't know why I'm even being bothered with this harassment.

I wasn't there. I supplied data and eyewitness accounts to back it up. I am not guilty. The allegations that were placed against me are false.

I don’t know who it is, and I know for a fact it wasn’t me. I have proof of my whereabouts on the days that they’re allegedly saying I was in the areas, and then I have documented proof showing that when I was in Bridgeport, I was there for a reason. I’ve said this before, and I will continue to say it. I know for a fact that this was not me, and these allegations don’t even make any sense.

Just look at the allegation that they make that the person had facial hair. whereas I didn't have any, and I have pictures and documentation to prove that. I am well documented in the state for my advocacy work. And to have these false charges brought against me is completely outrageous.

I’m not sure how many times I have to defend myself and my rights. I have provided solid and obvious proof. I've established my innocence and supported it with facts and eyewitness testimony; I'm requesting that my case be dismissed or transferred to a different court. I am not being treated fairly.

In my "Motion to Suppress Evidence" dated September 6, I add further information. On March 1, three years later, the case was a nolle, as they had no witnesses.

I would suggest anyone out there who has a criminal or civil case involving the Bridgeport Police Department, and especially Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462, is involved in your case, hire a competent and private attorney to look into your case. If you or your loved one has already been convicted and these officers are involved in the case, I would file an appeal and have it reopened.

Craig S Mvx
reply icon Replying to comment of Richard R Pvd

I strongly urge Bridgeport CT police internal affairs to research each of Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462 of the Bridgeport, CT, police department cases to see how many innocent and disabled individuals he has imprisoned or hospitalized over the years and to take the required legal actions to fix it and make that difference in somebody else's life and the lives of their families.

View more comments (4)

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content
  • PissedConsumer is on the Inc. 5000 list

For more information read Blog article