Carmax - Sold Crashed Car
- by pissedConsumersUnite Mar 02
- Review #: 389504
| Company | Carmax |
| Location | Los Angeles, California |
| Category | Auto Financing |
| Views | 247 |
$30000
Hi,
I purchased my Murano in September under 2008. The car , for all intents and purposes, was brand new. The five point summary report to me by Carmaxm, via , indicated the car "checked out", without any previous accidents, reports, etc.
Fast forward to present day. I noticed several on the side of the car that I can only describe as ripples. Sometime later, the rear passenger door was dinged up in a parking lot. I figure this is a good time as ever to get dings and ripples out. I took the car into a body shop to get it fixed. After they sand the entire passenger side, the body shop uncovers several large bondo patches. "Huh," I thought..."this car's never been in an accident." After not being able to shake the idea of having overlooked this on Carmax's Autocheck report, I decided to look for the paperwork. Indeed, the Autocheck I was given did show everything checked out--NO prior reports of accident or damage. Still not satisfied, I went to the Autocheck website and bought the report. Lo and behold, the report shows the car had been in accident prior to Carmax's purchase of it from an auction. Had I known this at the time of purchase, I certainly would have negotiated much better pricing or not have purchased the car at all.
This has now lead me to believe I was proactively lied to by Carmax. The Autocheck report given to me by Carmax says one thing; while the Autocheck report coming straight from the source, and as has now been corroborated to me by an , says something completely different. Having read similar stories from others' experiences with Carmax, I am convinced Carmax purposely withheld information that would negatively affect their sales. I am now looking into a class action law suit against Carmax. Carmax should be held accountable for participating in this type of shady behavior. 3127066
Mar 06
Really have not read more *** comments ever before. If a vehicle offered for sale either by owner or at any used car dealership and this vehicle had visible dents and scratches or a broken bumper, 99% of buyers will not consider it or will want to get it for dirt cheap. It does not matter if its one year old or one month old, if its used and driven, it is exposed to wear and tear. To all of you naturally born unhappy consumers READ CAREFULLY. Previous Paint does NOT = Accident or previous damage. Unless there is actual alteration or replacement on the unibody structure of the vehicle there is nothing to disclose. So according to you Mr pissed consumer , if a car gets a bumper replaced or a rear clip repainted because of a dent or a heavy scratch IT should get thrown away. You choose to buy used because you are saving big money. A One year old vehicle with 10k miles will sell for $5k to $7k below new msrp, but maybe you have to live with few scratched or repainted... Show more
Mar 08 from Kenosha, Wisconsin
Mar 31 from Branford, Connecticut
Mar 28 from Provo, Utah
Mar 28 from Branford, Connecticut
Mar 28 from Branford, Connecticut
Mar 04 from Richmond, Virginia
Mar 03 from Branford, Connecticut
Mar 02 from Merritt Island, Florida
Mar 03 from Branford, Connecticut
Mar 03 from Branford, Connecticut
Mar 05
How can the same reporting company produce TWO different reports? That is, unless Carmax gave me a false report.
Mar 05 from Branford, Connecticut
Mar 07
Mar 08 from Jeffersonville, Indiana
Showing 1-15 of 15 comments

Personal attacks will be deleted.
No Links or Scripts.