Bank of America - Bank of America Fraudulent Loan Modification Practices
- by Anonymous Aug 25, 2009
- Review #: 155810
| Company | Bank of America |
| Location | Hicksville, New York |
| Category | Banks |
| Views | 325 |
It is not news that there are of troubled homeowners in the country. It is not even news that the refuse most who request help.
But, are you aware of the that the are using to deny loan modifications?
Here is my story:
In July 2007, we re-financed with Countrywide in order to get out of an ARM that was about to go up astronomically.
In order to get the loan through, the value of our home was appraised over what is was really worth. In addition, only my husband's name was put on the loan since the are in my name.
The loan is an interest only arm that does not include taxes and insurance. The payment is $3407 and my husband takes home $1300 per week. I am a mom with 2 young children.
In September of 2008, we were struggling to pay our bills. The value of our home was plummeting. We weren't behind yet, but were about to be. We pro-actively contacted Countrywide in October 2008 and asked for help.
Here is a time-line of events:
October 2008 - Sent Countrywide . Husband withdraws $25K from his to pay bills. This money must be repaid quarterly - $1000.
December 2008 - Countrywide refuses loan mod without a reason.
March 2009 - plan underway. Contact Countrywide again. They say they can't help because we make too much money. Because they added husband's to his and used that figure! Request that they re-open our case.
May 2009 - Told by rep John McFarland that they will not help us since it is not their fault we are over-extended.
July 2009 - Contact Bank of America's Barbara Desoer to request a loan mod. Cannot pay August . Faxed new and required documents!.
August 2009 - Assigned Bank of America Melissa Henderson".
August 21, 2009 - BOA Melissa Henderson calls to inform me that our request is being denied?. She informed that we meet all of the requirements under President 's HAMP program, however, because my husband borrowed money from his retirement plan (which is depleted and we are still repaying), we do not qualify for a loan modification'. She said that we are current on and car payments and therefore do not fall under the guidelines for assistance?.
This is outright fraud.. The HAMP stipulates that retirement accounts cannot be used to determine financial status and in addition, being behind on anything (credit cards, mortgage, etc/.) is not a HAMP requirement;.
Think I am only one person? Wrong, go out to www.loansafe.org and read the thousands of horror stories.
The feet must be held to the fire! If we continue to let this happen, our country will be in worse shape than it is now!
Joanne in Hopewell 3105e6d
May 05
Sep 28, 2012
we both lost our jobs because of the "economic crisis in america"....
couldn't refinance without any employment!
applied for the loan modification program but didn't qualify the first time...
we went through the "loan mod" process again and were told we qualified....
but only after falling behind!
"congrats!....you're on your way to a more affordable mortgage!"
(their ACTUAL statement!)
after many months of jumping through their hoops and over their hurdles and
experiencing the "lost paperwork" syndrome they finally
sent another letter again stating congratulations!
here's your loan modification:
but they didn't lower the interest rate....
they didn't put the delinquent payments on the back end...
they didn't help by lowering the balance...
they actually UPPED the mortgage payment and demanded a check to bring the loan balance up to date!
too bad we couldn't afford to retain legal representation...
i KNOW they were just setting us up to foreclose...
so with all the equity we had...
and love of our home and location...
we ended up having to do a REVERSE MORTGAGE just to keep our home!
i think we got away from the evil bank just in time...
but i guess i shouldn't complain....
we're still here where we always wanted to be...
while so many americans have lost their homes after... Show more
Sep 28, 2012
we both lost our jobs because of the "economic crisis in america"....
couldn't refinance without any employment!
applied for the loan modification program but didn't qualify the first time...
we went through the "loan mod" process again and were told we qualified....
but only after falling behind!
"congrats!....you're on your way to a more affordable mortgage!"
(their ACTUAL statement!)
after many months of jumping through their hoops and over their hurdles and
experiencing the "lost paperwork" syndrome they finally
sent another letter again stating congratulations!
here's your loan modification:
but they didn't lower the interest rate....
they didn't put the delinquent payments on the back end...
they didn't help by lowering the balance...
they actually UPPED the mortgage payment and demanded a check to bring the loan balance up to date!
too bad we couldn't afford to retain legal representation...
i KNOW they were just setting us up to foreclose...
so with all the equity we had...
and love of our home and location...
we ended up having to do a REVERSE MORTGAGE just to keep our home!
i think we got away from the evil bank just in time...
but i guess i shouldn't complain....
we're still here where we always wanted to be...
while so many americans have lost their homes after... Show more
Aug 13, 2012
Feb 26, 2012
Feb 19, 2012
Feb 08
Feb 18, 2012
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE OREGON JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR LANE COUNTY, STATE OF OREGON
CIVIL DIVISION
GEORGE TRAN Pro Se
645 W18th Ave
Eugene, OR 97402,
Plaintiff,
Vs
John Beaver
Lane County of Oregon
125 East Eighth Ave
Eugene, OR 97401
Defendant.
Stan Surdam
Lane County of Oregon
125 East Eighth Ave
Eugene, OR 97401
Defendant.
CASE NO.:
Complaint for punitive damages for obstruction of lawful remedy
Amount: $499,999 plus legal fees
Obstruction of Lawful Remedy
Plaintiff GEORGE TRAN seeks damages as a result of Defendant John Beaver and Defendant Stan Surdam making legal determination on Plaintiff’s lawful remedy in response to Plaintiff’s current civil action Case No: 1210-05250 filed on March 5, 2010.
Pursuant of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) of 1946 and the right of Habeas Corpus, Plaintiff have requested a verification of debt with Chase Home Loan Services following Federal Rules of Civil... Show more
Oct 22, 2011
Oct 20, 2011
We had a loan modification with Countrywide which was approved march, 2009 then November 2009 was told by Bank of America that it was denied and had to do over which of course they denied a new modification sent a payment in April, 2010 and they sent it back saying house was in foreclosure, we have been fighting it ever since trying to get them to give us a new modification in the mean time fees etc. keep building up.
Sep 23, 2011
Sep 23, 2011
Aug 30, 2011
Feb 08 from Hartwell, Georgia
Aug 26, 2011
Aug 12, 2011 from Sha Tin, Hong Kong (sar)
Aug 04, 2011
Aug 03, 2011
Jul 30, 2011
BOA bought my loan from Wilshire in April 2010. I had to lease the house in August 2008 as it would not sell in the 18 months on market prior to new home being finished. Hurricane Ike hit the next month and markets crashed the following week.We met with Wilshire rep at a workshop and the loan officer offered a loan mod to get it out of the ARM and into a fixed rate. I had advised her we would be 30-60 days behind for a couple of months due to out of pocket expenses from Ike. She promised to have it fixed. We sent letters and documents she requested and was placed into a "Trial" modification.
I started getting suspicious as I had done a mod with Wells Fargo years ago after getting laid off and it was quick and and without a "Trial".
After the 6 month trial, we kept paying payment as each month they said they were backed up (January 2009 - August 2009, well over 6 mos). In September when calling to make payment, Wilshire said we were not eligible for the program as this was an investment property. I told them well your company put it in the program and EVERY correspondence identified it as such. It took 6 months for them to reassign it to a new "Trial" program and then they sold the loan the next month.
Our first clus was when BOA sent a foreclosure notice. We contacted them immediately and advised we were in a trial modification agreement. We faxed all of the Wilshire... Show more
Jul 22, 2011
Showing 1-20 of 125 comments

. If Chase Home Loan can not testify through Affidavit or assay that they are indeed a Creditor, they have no Standing.
Personal attacks will be deleted.
No Links or Scripts.